Smti Tana Mompa Taying @ Tana Mompa vs Taying Kuku and Anr Advocate - P P of AP — Crl.Petn./287/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: GAHC040021352025
Filing Number
Crl.Petn./889/2025
Filing Date
23-Dec-2025
Registration No
Crl.Petn./287/2025
Registration Date
23-Dec-2025
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Anjan Moni Kalita
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Anjan Moni Kalita
Bench Type
Single Bench
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Smti Tana Mompa Taying @ Tana Mompa
Adv. Tar Torum,Techi Nech,Techi Nech, ,T Taje,Kara Parang,Techi Nech
Respondent(s)
-
1.Taying Kuku and Anr Advocate - P P of AP
-
2.The State of AP
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
06-May-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Anjan Moni KalitaView PDF
Case Summary: Crl.Petn./287/2025 On 06.05.2026, the Gauhati High Court (Itanagar Bench) heard the criminal petition filed by Smti Tana Mompa Taying against Taying Kuku and the State of Arunachal Pradesh. The petitioner failed to appear despite the matter being called. The case had previously been referred to mediation at the Gauhati High Court Mediation Centre, but settlement could not be achieved. The court adjourned the matter and listed it for admission in the usual course after three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
For Referral To The Special Mediation Drive - Mediation For The Nation
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete
-
24-Feb-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF
-
21-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Dec-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Anjan Moni KalitaView PDF
-
23-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.Petn./287/2025
Case Summary: Crl.Petn./287/2025 On 06.05.2026, the Gauhati High Court (Itanagar Bench) heard the criminal petition filed by Smti Tana Mompa Taying against Taying Kuku and the State of Arunachal Pradesh. The petitioner failed to appear despite the matter being called. The case had previously been referred to mediation at the Gauhati High Court Mediation Centre, but settlement could not be achieved. The court adjourned the matter and listed it for admission in the usual course after three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts