Bitumix India LLP S Jain, ,J Das vs Manish Gupta and 2 Ors Advocate - Gimi Tarak, ,Byabang Mema — Cont.Cas(C)/27/2025
Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 12. Next hearing: 25th May 2026.
CNR: GAHC040015952025
Filing Number
Cont.Cas(C)/923/2025
Filing Date
15-Sep-2025
Registration No
Cont.Cas(C)/27/2025
Registration Date
15-Sep-2025
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Budi Habung
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Budi Habung
Bench Type
Single Bench
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Bitumix India LLP S Jain, ,J Das
Respondent(s)
-
1.Manish Gupta and 2 Ors Advocate - Gimi Tarak, ,Byabang Mema
-
2.Hibu Tama
-
3.Techi Totu Tara
Case History
-
25-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
25-May-2026
Orders
Honourable Mr. Justice Budi Habung
-
04-May-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Budi HabungView PDF
Case Summary: Cont.Cas(C)/27/2025 Court: Gauhati High Court (Itanagar Bench) Parties: Bitumix India LLP v. Manish Gupta and 2 Ors Date: 04.05.2026 Outcome: The court permitted petitioner's counsel to amend the cause title due to typographical errors in respondent Nos. 1 & 2, allowing one week for filing an amended application. The matter was adjourned for three weeks to allow respondent No. 3's counsel to file an affidavit-in-opposition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Orders
Honourable Mr. Justice Robin Phukan
-
27-Mar-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Robin PhukanView PDF
-
18-Mar-2026
Orders
Honourable Mr. Justice Nelson Sailo
-
11-Mar-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Nelson SailoView PDF
-
15-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Sep-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Nelson SailoView PDF
-
15-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. Cont.Cas(C)/27/2025
Case Summary: Cont.Cas(C)/27/2025 Court: Gauhati High Court (Itanagar Bench) Parties: Bitumix India LLP v. Manish Gupta and 2 Ors Date: 04.05.2026 Outcome: The court permitted petitioner's counsel to amend the cause title due to typographical errors in respondent Nos. 1 & 2, allowing one week for filing an amended application. The matter was adjourned for three weeks to allow respondent No. 3's counsel to file an affidavit-in-opposition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts