Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd vs Rakhe Tallar and 2 Ors — MC/1/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Next hearing: 27th May 2026.

Next hearing 27-May-2026

CNR: GAHC040015082025

Filing Number

MC/876/2025

Filing Date

04-Sep-2025

Registration No

MC/1/2025

Registration Date

04-Sep-2025

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Anjan Moni Kalita

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Anjan Moni Kalita

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 151

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd

    Adv. Uttam Deka,Tadar Bai,Tadar Bai, ,E S NIDO MARI,T Char,Tadar Bai

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rakhe Tallar and 2 Ors

  2. 2.Hemanta Kumar Das

  3. 3.Md Inush Ali

Case History

  1. 27-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 27-May-2026

    Orders

    Honourable Mr. Justice Anjan Moni Kalita

  3. 06-May-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Anjan Moni KalitaView PDF

    Case Summary: MC/1/2025 The Gauhati High Court (Itanagar Bench) adjourned the case on 06.05.2026. Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company sought additional time to serve notice on respondents 2 and 3, as service steps remained incomplete as of 27.11.2025, though respondent 1 had already filed an affidavit-in-opposition. The court granted the petitioner's prayer and directed fresh service steps within three days, with the matter listed for hearing after three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Honourable Mr. Justice Budi Habung

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Budi HabungView PDF

  6. 12-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 28-Nov-2025

    Honourable Mr. Justice Budi HabungView PDF

  8. 04-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. MC/1/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MC/1/2025 The Gauhati High Court (Itanagar Bench) adjourned the case on 06.05.2026. Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company sought additional time to serve notice on respondents 2 and 3, as service steps remained incomplete as of 27.11.2025, though respondent 1 had already filed an affidavit-in-opposition. The court granted the petitioner's prayer and directed fresh service steps within three days, with the matter listed for hearing after three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case