Bodhisatta Chakma and 17 Ors vs The State of AP and 6 Ors Advocate - GA (AP) — IA(C)/96/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Disposed: --Disposed Of on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC040006332026

Filing Number

IA(C)/393/2026

Filing Date

06-May-2026

Registration No

IA(C)/96/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Budi Habung

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Budi Habung

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed Of

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bodhisatta Chakma and 17 Ors

    Adv. Chanya Bangsia

  2. 2.Usha May Chakma

  3. 3.Sumel Dewan Chakma

  4. 4.Moni Mohan Chakma

  5. 5.Rakesh Chakma

  6. 6.Jitendra Chakma

  7. 7.Ananda Chakma

  8. 8.Raju Chakma

  9. 9.Bijoy Chakma

  10. 10.Lakhi Mukhi Chakma

  11. 11.Prity Moy Chakma

  12. 12.Riya Chakma

  13. 13.Amar Kanti Chakma

  14. 14.Kalasing Chakma

  15. 15.Maratya Chakma

  16. 16.Ajoy Chakma

  17. 17.Aloranjan Chakma

  18. 18.Dipika Chakma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of AP and 6 Ors Advocate - GA (Government Advocate) (AP)

  2. 2.The Secretary

  3. 3.The Director

  4. 4.The District Collector cum Deputy Commissioner

  5. 5.Chakma Rehabilitation and Resettlement Committee

  6. 6.The Airport Authority of India

  7. 7.The Ministry of Civil Aviation

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Budi HabungView PDF

    Case Summary: IA(C)/96/2026 Court Decision: The Gauhati High Court (Itanagar Bench) granted the applicants' petition to implead the Airport Authority of India and the Ministry of Civil Aviation, Government of India as necessary party respondents (Nos. 6 & 7) in the underlying writ petition WP(C) 110(AP) 2023. Key Reasoning: The court found that both entities are necessary parties because any compensation ordered in the case would need to be paid by these authorities. The State's Additional Advocate General did not object to the impleadment request, leading to its approval. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA(C)/96/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: IA(C)/96/2026 Court Decision: The Gauhati High Court (Itanagar Bench) granted the applicants' petition to implead the Airport Authority of India and the Ministry of Civil Aviation, Government of India as necessary party respondents (Nos. 6 & 7) in the underlying writ petition WP(C) 110(AP) 2023. Key Reasoning: The court found that both entities are necessary parties because any compensation ordered in the case would need to be paid by these authorities. The State's Additional Advocate General did not object to the impleadment request, leading to its approval. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case