Koruna Sindhu Chakma and 129 Ors vs The State of AP and 5 Ors Advocate - GA (AP) — IA(C)/94/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 07th May 2026.

CNR: GAHC040006312026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

IA(C)/391/2026

Filing Date

06-05-2026

Registration No

IA(C)/94/2026

Registration Date

06-05-2026

Judge

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG

Coram

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Of

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 1

Petitioner(s)

Koruna Sindhu Chakma and 129 Ors

Adv. Chanya Bangsia

Ronindra Chakma

Biberon Chakma

Nipa Rani Chakma

Mirinal Chakma

Sheno Ranjan Chakma

Pandobo Chakma

Bimal Kanti Chakma

Sunil Kanti Chakma

Navajyoti Chakma

India Basu Chakma

Pushpa Bala Chakma

Kokilaranjan Chakma

Satyaranjan Chakma

Koruna Mol Chakma

Suddhadhan Chakma

Punang Chand Chakma

Bijupudi Chakma

Rabi Ranjan Chakma

Kripa Jyoti Chakma

Samarjyoti Chakma

Romoni Chakma

Arunmoni Chakma

Buddhomor Chakma

Surendra Chakma

Biswajit Chakma

Kalasona Chakma

Ravi Ranjan Chakma

Bijoy Kumar Chakma

Sukroranjan Chakma

Bironjan Chakma

Satish Chandra Chakma

Suresh Kanti Chakma

Kinaram Chakma

Rajendra Chakma

Jatil Chandra Chakma

Somar Singh Chakma

Shanti Bala Chakma

Pobang Chakma

Panchaboti Chakma

Prideep Chakma

Kinadhan Chakma

Premojit Chakma

Gynojit Chakma

Indrajit Chakma

Nibaron Chakma

Jagaron Chakma

Siran Kishore Chakma

Priyomoi Chakma

Jiten Chakma

Sudhhadhan Chakma

Baradhan Chakma

Rajen Chakma

Kalendra Chakma

Nilak Baron Chakma

Anil Chakma

Odion Chakma

Sojit Chakma

Shamal Kanti Chakma

Mondeep Chakma

Natunjay Chakma

Sukendra Chakma

Surolal Chakma

Chandralal Chakma

Nilomoni Chakma

Adiya Chakma

Jibit Kanti Chakma

Puinojoy Chakma

Kalapurna Chakma

Ramesh Dh Chakma

Karna Chakma

Bimal Tara Chakma

Diyana Chakma

Borin Chakma

Rajkumar Chakma

Kandra Chakma

Babu Chakma

Pulamohan Chakma

Sukkroraj Chakma

Karuna Roshi Chakma

Sneharo Ranjan Chakma

Nityadhan Chakma

Jattan Chakma

Sadhan Moni Chakma

Devasish Chakma

Alindra Chakma

Lakhi Mohan Chakma

Subash Chakma

Prodeep Kumar Chakma

Tinadhan Chakma

Pushpadhan Chakma

Gurimala Chakma

Bilash Chandra Chakma

Subhash Chakma

Sanjay Kumar Chakma

Devasani Chakma

Amar Binda Chakma

Rajani Kanta Chakma

Timluk Kamala Chakma

Manus Kumar Chakma

Satyajeet Chakma

Robin Chakma

Profullabala Chakma

Babuso Chakma

Chandra Kumar Chakma

Arun Chakma

Nepali Chakma

Rupamaya Chakma

Joy Kumar Chakma

Ranjan Kumar Chakma

Susil Chandra Chakma

Dhanyabi Chakma

Lakhidhan Chakma

Kinadhan Chakma

Susila Chakma

Brajo Kumar Chakma

Prabhat Chakma

Notonmoni Chakma

Mona Muni Chakma

Satya Priyo Chakma

Monikyahyoti Chakma

Ajit Baburoh Chakma

Kanti Chakma

Rahula Chakma

Bharat Kanti Chakma

Sobha Ranjan Chakma

Amar Chakma

Bipin Chakma

Nirodh Kumar Chakma

Mamta Chakma

Respondent(s)

The State of AP and 5 Ors Advocate - GA (Government Advocate) (AP)

The Secretary

The Director

The District Collector cum Deputy Commissioner

The Airport Authority of India

The Ministry of Civil Aviation

Orders

07-05-2026
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG

Summary: IA(C)/94/2026 - Koruna Sindhu Chakma and Ors v. State of AP and Ors Court Decision: The Gauhati High Court (Itanagar Bench) allowed an interlocutory application filed by the petitioners seeking impleadment of the Airport Authority of India (AAI) and Ministry of Civil Aviation as necessary party respondents. The court granted the request without objection from the State respondent, finding both entities necessary parties given potential compensation liability implications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: IA(C)/94/2026 - Koruna Sindhu Chakma and Ors v. State of AP and Ors Court Decision: The Gauhati High Court (Itanagar Bench) allowed an interlocutory application filed by the petitioners seeking impleadment of the Airport Authority of India (AAI) and Ministry of Civil Aviation as necessary party respondents. The court granted the request without objection from the State respondent, finding both entities necessary parties given potential compensation liability implications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case