Gumter Ori vs Shiv Darshan Singh Jamwal and Anr — Cont.Cas(C)/15/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 11. Status: Motion. Next hearing: 25th May 2026.

Motion Next hearing 25-May-2026 this date has passed

CNR: GAHC040006082026

Filing Number

Cont.Cas(C)/382/2026

Filing Date

02-May-2026

Registration No

Cont.Cas(C)/15/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Budi Habung

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Budi Habung

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 11

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Gumter Ori

    Adv. Marto Kato,Mepe Ete,Mepe Ete, ,Oli Jerang,Tony Meto,Yasmin Gao,Nyali Sora,Mepe Ete

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shiv Darshan Singh Jamwal and Anr

  2. 2.Bomge Kamduk

Case History

  1. 25-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-May-2026

    Motion

    Honourable Mr. Justice Budi Habung

  3. 04-May-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Budi HabungView PDF

    Case Summary: Cont.Cas(C)/15/2026 Gumter Ori filed a contempt of court application alleging non-compliance with a judgment dated 19.01.2026 from WP(C)88(AP)2025 by respondents Shiv Darshan Singh Jamwal (DGP) and Bomge Kamduk (AIG Police). The Gauhati High Court (Itanagar Bench) issued notice on the respondents, returnable within three weeks, and directed the petitioner to serve notice via speed post and usual process within three working days. The matter was adjourned for hearing after three weeks on a date to be fixed by the Registry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 02-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cont.Cas(C)/15/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Cont.Cas(C)/15/2026 Gumter Ori filed a contempt of court application alleging non-compliance with a judgment dated 19.01.2026 from WP(C)88(AP)2025 by respondents Shiv Darshan Singh Jamwal (DGP) and Bomge Kamduk (AIG Police). The Gauhati High Court (Itanagar Bench) issued notice on the respondents, returnable within three weeks, and directed the petitioner to serve notice via speed post and usual process within three working days. The matter was adjourned for hearing after three weeks on a date to be fixed by the Registry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case