Philip Brahma @ Rahul Brahma vs The State of AP Advocate - P P of AP — AB/34/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 04th May 2026.
CNR: GAHC040005522026
Filing Number
AB/211/2026
Filing Date
21-Apr-2026
Registration No
AB/34/2026
Registration Date
21-Apr-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Anjan Moni Kalita
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Anjan Moni Kalita
Bench Type
Single Bench
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Of
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Philip Brahma @ Rahul Brahma
Adv. Hage Tai,A K Azad,A K Azad, ,Tassar Tato,A Ali,A K Azad
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of AP Advocate - P P of AP
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
21-May-2026
Bail Hearing
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete
-
04-May-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Anjan Moni KalitaView PDF
The Gauhati High Court granted pre-arrest bail to Philip Brahma in a narcotics case (Ruksin P.S. Case No. 09/2026) involving alleged heroin trafficking. The court found insufficient material linking the applicant to the offense, noting the seized narcotics quantity was intermediate and the only evidence was a co-accused's statement. Bail was granted on Rs. 30,000 bond with conditions requiring appearance before the investigating officer within 10 days, cooperation with investigation, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Bail Hearing
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete
-
29-Apr-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF
-
29-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Apr-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF
-
21-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. AB/34/2026
The Gauhati High Court granted pre-arrest bail to Philip Brahma in a narcotics case (Ruksin P.S. Case No. 09/2026) involving alleged heroin trafficking. The court found insufficient material linking the applicant to the offense, noting the seized narcotics quantity was intermediate and the only evidence was a co-accused's statement. Bail was granted on Rs. 30,000 bond with conditions requiring appearance before the investigating officer within 10 days, cooperation with investigation, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts