Karsang Tania R Taku, ,Khyoda Yayo,M Basar,Binny Nyaruce,Taring Takap vs The State of AP and Anr Advocate - P P of AP — Crl.A./9/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415(2). Next hearing: 28th May 2026.

Next hearing 28-May-2026

CNR: GAHC040005332026

Filing Number

Crl.A./203/2026

Filing Date

10-Apr-2026

Registration No

Crl.A./9/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Budi Habung , Honourable Mr. Justice Anjan Moni Kalita

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Budi Habung , Honourable Mr. Justice Anjan Moni Kalita

Bench Type

Division Bench

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Karsang Tania R Taku, ,Khyoda Yayo,M Basar,Binny Nyaruce,Taring Takap

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of AP and Anr Advocate - P P of AP

  2. 2.Karsang Tamar

Case History

  1. 28-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 28-May-2026

    Admission

    Honourable Mr. Justice Budi Habung , Honourable Mr. Justice Anjan Moni Kalita

  3. 07-May-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Budi Habung,honourable Mr. Justice Anjan Moni KalitaView PDF

    Case Summary: Crl.A./9/2026 In this criminal appeal before the Gauhati High Court (Itanagar Bench), the petitioner Karsang Tania challenged certain proceedings. On 07.05.2026, the court granted the petitioner's request and adjourned the matter for three weeks, with the Registry to fix the next hearing date. The adjournment was granted with the consent of both the appellant's counsel and the Additional Public Prosecutor of Arunachal Pradesh. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A./9/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.A./9/2026 In this criminal appeal before the Gauhati High Court (Itanagar Bench), the petitioner Karsang Tania challenged certain proceedings. On 07.05.2026, the court granted the petitioner's request and adjourned the matter for three weeks, with the Registry to fix the next hearing date. The adjournment was granted with the consent of both the appellant's counsel and the Additional Public Prosecutor of Arunachal Pradesh. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case