Bijoy Pertin vs The State of AP and 3 Ors Advocate - GA (AP), ,Abanso Gamre,B Padung,Vijay Jamoh,SC (Food and Civil Supplies Department),Tagum Jamoh — WP(C)/153/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
CNR: GAHC040004892026
Filing Number
WP(C)/307/2026
Filing Date
06-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/153/2026
Registration Date
06-Apr-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete
Bench Type
Single Bench
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Bijoy Pertin
Adv. Muk Pertin, Senior Advocate,Karyom Dabi,Karyom Dabi, ,Dakjum Riba,Mukbang Pertin,Takom Pabin,Tshering Yangzom Bhutia,Mukbom Pertin,Rimo Riba,Karyom Dabi
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of AP and 3 Ors Advocate - GA (Government Advocate) (AP), ,Abanso Gamre,B Padung,Vijay Jamoh,SC (Food and Civil Supplies Department),Tagum Jamoh
-
2.The Secretary
-
3.The Director
-
4.Dana Yirang
Case History
-
03-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
03-Jun-2026
Orders
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete
-
27-May-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF
Case Summary: WP(C)/153/2026 - Bijoy Pertin v. State of AP The Gauhati High Court (Itanagar Bench) adjourned the writ petition for hearing on admission after one week. The Court directed respondents to file affidavits and produce records, noting the Supreme Court's earlier direction for early disposal without being influenced by prior interim order rejections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-May-2026
Orders
Honourable Mr. Justice Budi Habung
-
05-May-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Budi HabungView PDF
-
04-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Apr-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar MedhiView PDF
-
06-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/153/2026
Case Summary: WP(C)/153/2026 - Bijoy Pertin v. State of AP The Gauhati High Court (Itanagar Bench) adjourned the writ petition for hearing on admission after one week. The Court directed respondents to file affidavits and produce records, noting the Supreme Court's earlier direction for early disposal without being influenced by prior interim order rejections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts