Sh. Lalliantluanga Sailo vs The State of Mizoram and 4 Ors. Advocate - Addl. AG/GA, Mizoram — WP(C)/130/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section Article226. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: GAHC030007162025
Filing Number
WP(C)/496/2025
Filing Date
24-Oct-2025
Registration No
WP(C)/130/2025
Registration Date
27-Oct-2025
Judge
Honorable Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla Longkumer
Coram
Honorable Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla Longkumer
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10028 - Promotion with respect to State Govt Employees. ( 28 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sh. Lalliantluanga Sailo
Adv. Mr Ashok Kumar Rokhum,Mr. Samuel L Pachuau,Mr. Samuel L Pachuau, ,Mr. Lalsangkima Ralte,Mr. Samuel L Pachuau
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Mizoram and 4 Ors. Advocate - Addl. AG/GA, Mizoram
-
2.The Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram
-
3.The Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram,
-
4.The Principal Director, Health and Family Welfare Department
-
5.The Director, Hospital and Medical Education Department,
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
07-May-2026
Honorable Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla LongkumerView PDF
Case Summary: WP(C)/130/2025 In this Gauhati High Court petition by Sh. Lalliantluanga Sailo against the State of Mizoram and four officials, the matter was called on 07.05.2026 before Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla Longkumer. The petitioner failed to appear in court. The Government Advocate sought two weeks to receive instructions and file an affidavit on behalf of the State respondents, which was granted. The case was adjourned and listed for hearing after two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Oct-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Robin PhukanView PDF
-
24-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/130/2025
Case Summary: WP(C)/130/2025 In this Gauhati High Court petition by Sh. Lalliantluanga Sailo against the State of Mizoram and four officials, the matter was called on 07.05.2026 before Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla Longkumer. The petitioner failed to appear in court. The Government Advocate sought two weeks to receive instructions and file an affidavit on behalf of the State respondents, which was granted. The case was adjourned and listed for hearing after two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts