Sh. Abdul Mukit vs The State of Mizoram Advocate - P.P./Addl.PP, Mizoram — I.A.(Crl.)/24/2026

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 07th May 2026.

CNR: GAHC030002832026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

I.A.(Crl.)/90/2026

Filing Date

04-05-2026

Registration No

I.A.(Crl.)/24/2026

Registration Date

05-05-2026

Judge

HONORABLE MRS. JUSTICE YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER

Coram

HONORABLE MRS. JUSTICE YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10302 - Interlocutory Application (Criminal) ( 383 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Of

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5

Petitioner(s)

Sh. Abdul Mukit

Adv. Mr. S. Vanlalhriata,Ms. Vanlalchhandami,Ms. Vanlalchhandami, ,Ms. Vanlalchhandami

Respondent(s)

The State of Mizoram Advocate - P.P./Addl.PP, Mizoram

The Officer in Charge

Orders

07-05-2026
HONORABLE MRS. JUSTICE YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER

The Gauhati High Court allowed Abdul Mukit's application for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, permitting him to file Criminal Appeal No. 7 of 2026 despite being 162 days late. Justice Yarenjungla Longkumer found sufficient cause for the delay and noted the State's Public Prosecutor did not object to the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Gauhati High Court allowed Abdul Mukit's application for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, permitting him to file Criminal Appeal No. 7 of 2026 despite being 162 days late. Justice Yarenjungla Longkumer found sufficient cause for the delay and noted the State's Public Prosecutor did not object to the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case