Sh. Abdul Mukit vs The State of Mizoram Advocate - P.P./Addl.PP, Mizoram — I.A.(Crl.)/24/2026
Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 07th May 2026.
CNR: GAHC030002832026
Filing Number
I.A.(Crl.)/90/2026
Filing Date
04-May-2026
Registration No
I.A.(Crl.)/24/2026
Registration Date
05-May-2026
Judge
Honorable Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla Longkumer
Coram
Honorable Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla Longkumer
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10302 - Interlocutory Application (Criminal) ( 383 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Of
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sh. Abdul Mukit
Adv. Mr. S. Vanlalhriata,Ms. Vanlalchhandami,Ms. Vanlalchhandami, ,Ms. Vanlalchhandami
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Mizoram Advocate - P.P./Addl.PP, Mizoram
-
2.The Officer in Charge
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Honorable Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla LongkumerView PDF
The Gauhati High Court allowed Abdul Mukit's application for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, permitting him to file Criminal Appeal No. 7 of 2026 despite being 162 days late. Justice Yarenjungla Longkumer found sufficient cause for the delay and noted the State's Public Prosecutor did not object to the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. I.A.(Crl.)/24/2026
The Gauhati High Court allowed Abdul Mukit's application for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, permitting him to file Criminal Appeal No. 7 of 2026 despite being 162 days late. Justice Yarenjungla Longkumer found sufficient cause for the delay and noted the State's Public Prosecutor did not object to the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts