Sh. Lalpianmawia and Anr. vs Smt. F. Lalthanmawii Advocate - Mr. C Tlanthianghlima, ,Ms. Vanlalthlamuani,Mr. Lalruatdika — RFA/12/2026
Case under Mizoram Civil Courts Act, 2005 Section 17(2)(b). Status: Admission. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: GAHC030002762026
Filing Number
RFA/189/2026
Filing Date
30-Apr-2026
Registration No
RFA/12/2026
Registration Date
30-Apr-2026
Judge
Honorable Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla Longkumer
Coram
Honorable Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla Longkumer
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10229 - Other First Appeals. ( 196 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sh. Lalpianmawia and Anr.
Adv. Mr. Lalbiaknunga Hnamte,Mr. Malsawmdawngzela Thihlum,Mr. Malsawmdawngzela Thihlum, ,Mr Vanlalsiama Pachuau,Ms Lalrinpuii Sailo,Ms. Vanlaldinpuii,Ms. Babie Lalthakimi,Ms. B Vanlalhriatpuii,Mr. Malsawmdawngzela Thihlum
-
2.Smt. V. Salemthari
Respondent(s)
-
1.Smt. F. Lalthanmawii Advocate - Mr. C Tlanthianghlima, ,Ms. Vanlalthlamuani,Mr. Lalruatdika
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
05-May-2026
Honorable Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla LongkumerView PDF
Case Summary: RFA/12/2026 The Gauhati High Court admitted an appeal against a Heirship Certificate decree issued by the Civil Judge-III, Kolasib District on March 17, 2026. The appellants contended that the certificate was obtained without proper notice to them or other interested relatives, and that objections were invited only through one local newspaper despite the property being located in their residential area. The court admitted the appeal for hearing, directed appellants' counsel to serve the respondent via Speed Post and usual process within one week, and listed the matter for hearing after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. RFA/12/2026
Case Summary: RFA/12/2026 The Gauhati High Court admitted an appeal against a Heirship Certificate decree issued by the Civil Judge-III, Kolasib District on March 17, 2026. The appellants contended that the certificate was obtained without proper notice to them or other interested relatives, and that objections were invited only through one local newspaper despite the property being located in their residential area. The court admitted the appeal for hearing, directed appellants' counsel to serve the respondent via Speed Post and usual process within one week, and listed the matter for hearing after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts