The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. through the Branch Manager, Aizawl Branch vs Sh. Liansangkunga and 3 Ors. — I.A.(Civil)/88/2026

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC030002702026

Filing Number

I.A.(Civil)/183/2026

Filing Date

28-Apr-2026

Registration No

I.A.(Civil)/88/2026

Registration Date

29-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti Saikia

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti Saikia

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. through the Branch Manager, Aizawl Branch

    Adv. Mr Lalfakawma,Ms. Lalremruati Renthlei,Ms. Lalremruati Renthlei, ,Mr T Lalzekima,Ms Annie Lalenkawli,Ms. Lalropari,Ms. Priscilla Lallawmsangi Solo,Ms. Lalremruati Renthlei

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sh. Liansangkunga and 3 Ors.

  2. 2.Smt. Josephine Ramtharnghaki

  3. 3.Sh. Anil Kumar Sethi

  4. 4.Sh. C. Thawmvunga

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti SaikiaView PDF

    The Gauhati High Court granted New India Assurance Co. Ltd.'s application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, condoning a 99-day delay in filing a Motor Accidents Claims (MAC) Appeal. The Court found the delay satisfactorily explained and deemed issuing notice to respondents unnecessary, instead directly ordering the connected MAC Appeal for admission hearing the following week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/88/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Gauhati High Court granted New India Assurance Co. Ltd.'s application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, condoning a 99-day delay in filing a Motor Accidents Claims (MAC) Appeal. The Court found the delay satisfactorily explained and deemed issuing notice to respondents unnecessary, instead directly ordering the connected MAC Appeal for admission hearing the following week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case