C. Lalremtluanga and 262 Ors. vs District Collector, Kolasib and 3 Ors. — WP(C)/44/2026

Case under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (Repealed) Section 28A. Status: Motion. Next hearing: : -.

Motion Next hearing —

CNR: GAHC030002642026

Filing Number

WP(C)/179/2026

Filing Date

27-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/44/2026

Registration Date

28-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti Saikia

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti Saikia

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10151 - Acquisition of land. ( 144 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (Repealed) Section 28A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.C. Lalremtluanga and 262 Ors.

    Adv. Mr. Lalsawirema,Melody Laltlankimi,Melody Laltlankimi, ,Mr. Lalthangmawia,Sherry Valentina,Melody Laltlankimi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.District Collector, Kolasib and 3 Ors.

  2. 2.General Manager (Con), Northeast Frontier Railway, Maligaon, Guwahati, Assam

  3. 3.Dy. Chief Engineer (Con), NF Railway, Bairabi-Sairang, Mizoram

  4. 4.Sub-Divisional Officer (Sadar)

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti SaikiaView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(C)/44/2026 Outcome: The writ petition filed by C. Lalremtluanga and 262 others against the District Collector, Kolasib and Northeast Frontier Railway officials was admitted. Notice was issued to all respondents, with petitioners directed to serve notices via Speed Post. The case was adjourned for hearing after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/44/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(C)/44/2026 Outcome: The writ petition filed by C. Lalremtluanga and 262 others against the District Collector, Kolasib and Northeast Frontier Railway officials was admitted. Notice was issued to all respondents, with petitioners directed to serve notices via Speed Post. The case was adjourned for hearing after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case