The Director, TARMAT Ltd. and Anr. vs Sh. B. Sanga and 5 Ors. Advocate - Addl. AG/GA, Mizoram — RFA/3/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 1. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: GAHC030000602025

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

RFA/43/2025

Filing Date

31-01-2025

Registration No

RFA/3/2025

Registration Date

31-01-2025

Judge

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA

Coram

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10228 - Appeals against Original Decrees. ( 195 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 1
Mizoram Civil Courts Act, 2005 Section 17(2)(b)

Petitioner(s)

The Director, TARMAT Ltd. and Anr.

Adv. Mr A.R. Malhotra,Ms. Lalramengmawii,Ms. Lalramengmawii, ,Mr. C Tlanthianghlima,Ms Faby Lalrinnungi,Ms. Lalramengmawii

The Project Manager, TARMAT Ltd.

Respondent(s)

Sh. B. Sanga and 5 Ors. Advocate - Addl. AG/GA, Mizoram

The State of Mizoram

The Engineer-in-Chief

The Project Director

The Executive Engineer

The Deputy Commissioner

Orders

04-05-2026
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA

Case Summary: RFA/3/2025 In this Regular First Appeal before the Gauhati High Court, TARMAT Ltd. (Director and Project Manager) challenged a lower court decision against Sh. B. Sanga and five others, along with the State of Mizoram and PWD officials. On 04.05.2026, Justice Parthivjyoti Saikia adjourned the matter, ordering it to be listed again after one week for hearing. No substantive order on merits was passed at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RFA/3/2025 In this Regular First Appeal before the Gauhati High Court, TARMAT Ltd. (Director and Project Manager) challenged a lower court decision against Sh. B. Sanga and five others, along with the State of Mizoram and PWD officials. On 04.05.2026, Justice Parthivjyoti Saikia adjourned the matter, ordering it to be listed again after one week for hearing. No substantive order on merits was passed at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case