RELIANCE GENERAL INS. CO.LTD. vs SMTI. CHUNNI PODDAR AND 5 ORS — MACApp./28/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
CNR: GAHC020008572025
Filing Number
MACApp./648/2025
Filing Date
08-Dec-2025
Registration No
MACApp./28/2025
Registration Date
08-Dec-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla Longkumer
Coram
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla Longkumer
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10223 - Appeals from motor accident claims tribunal. ( 191 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RELIANCE GENERAL INS. CO.LTD.
Adv. VIKRAMJEET DEVNATH
Respondent(s)
-
1.SMTI. CHUNNI PODDAR AND 5 ORS
-
2.MASTER RUDRA PODDAR
-
3.MASTER BISHAL PODDAR
-
4.SMTI. SANDHYA DEVI PODDAR
-
5.SHRI REIKIBUDDIN KHAN
-
6.MR. NAZIM UDDIN
Case History
-
15-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Jun-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla Longkumer
-
25-May-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla LongkumerView PDF
Case Summary: MACApp./28/2025 The Gauhati High Court (Kohima Bench) heard Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd.'s appeal against Smti. Chunni Poddar and 5 others on 25.05.2026. The court found that proper service had not been effected on respondents 1-6. The court adjourned the matter, directing the petitioner's counsel to serve all respondents via Speed Post and regular process within one week, with the case to be listed after three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-May-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar Sharma
-
08-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar SharmaView PDF
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla LongkumerView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla LongkumerView PDF
-
08-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. MACApp./28/2025
Case Summary: MACApp./28/2025 The Gauhati High Court (Kohima Bench) heard Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd.'s appeal against Smti. Chunni Poddar and 5 others on 25.05.2026. The court found that proper service had not been effected on respondents 1-6. The court adjourned the matter, directing the petitioner's counsel to serve all respondents via Speed Post and regular process within one week, with the case to be listed after three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts