SMTI. ALEMLA CHANG vs SHRI SENTIYANGER IMCHEN, IAS AND 9 ORS — COP(C)/21/2025

Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 11,12. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

Next hearing 23-Jun-2026

CNR: GAHC020005482025

Filing Number

COP(C)/417/2025

Filing Date

25-Aug-2025

Registration No

COP(C)/21/2025

Registration Date

25-Aug-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla Longkumer

Coram

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla Longkumer

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10200 - Contempt Petition (Civil). ( 178 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 11,12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMTI. ALEMLA CHANG

    Adv. I. IMTI LONGCHAR,W YAKAP KONYAK,W YAKAP KONYAK, ,MOANUKSUNG KICHU,OBANGNENLA LONGCHAR,VIKHONO KISO,W YAKAP KONYAK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHRI SENTIYANGER IMCHEN, IAS AND 9 ORS

  2. 2.SHRI MOHAMMAD ALI SHIHAB, IAS

  3. 3.SHRI ABHIJIT SINHA, IAS

  4. 4.SHRI KESONYU YHOME, IAS

  5. 5.BHAGYASHREE BHIMRAOJI BANAYAT, IAS (NE-

  6. 6.SMTI. LITHRONGLA TONGPI RUTSA

  7. 7.SHRI RUPIN SHARMA, IPS

  8. 8.SHRI KANCHAN KUMAR KANDPAL, IPS

  9. 9.SMTI. TSUYILA M

  10. 10.SHRI VARUN AHLUWALIA, IAAS

    Adv. JOSHUA SHEQI,JOSHUA SHEQI (R-

Case History

  1. 23-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Jun-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla Longkumer

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla LongkumerView PDF

    Case Summary: COP(C)/21/2025 Smti. Alemla Chang, widow of a deceased constable, petitioned the Gauhati High Court seeking extraordinary pension. On 02.06.2026, Justice Yarenjungla Longkumer adjourned the case for three weeks after directing respondent No.10 (Accountant General) to obtain complete required documents from respondent No.7 (DGP) for processing the pension claim. Service on respondent No.2 was deemed complete, though the court found their role negligible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 02-Jun-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar Sharma

  5. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar SharmaView PDF

  6. 21-Apr-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla Longkumer

  7. 07-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla LongkumerView PDF

  8. 30-Mar-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla Longkumer

  9. 16-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla LongkumerView PDF

  10. 26-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla LongkumerView PDF

  11. 23-Feb-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla Longkumer

  12. 05-Feb-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla Longkumer

  13. 02-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla LongkumerView PDF

  14. 15-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla LongkumerView PDF

  15. 12-Dec-2025

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla Longkumer

  16. 14-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla LongkumerView PDF

  17. 07-Nov-2025

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anjan Moni Kalita

  18. 27-Oct-2025

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla Longkumer

  19. 24-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anjan Moni KalitaView PDF

  20. 24-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anjan Moni KalitaView PDF

  21. 13-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla LongkumerView PDF

  22. 06-Oct-2025

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla Longkumer

  23. 19-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla LongkumerView PDF

  24. 16-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 26-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pranjal DasView PDF

  26. 25-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. COP(C)/21/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: COP(C)/21/2025 Smti. Alemla Chang, widow of a deceased constable, petitioned the Gauhati High Court seeking extraordinary pension. On 02.06.2026, Justice Yarenjungla Longkumer adjourned the case for three weeks after directing respondent No.10 (Accountant General) to obtain complete required documents from respondent No.7 (DGP) for processing the pension claim. Service on respondent No.2 was deemed complete, though the court found their role negligible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case