SMTI. MANNON WANGNAO K AND 42 ORS vs THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 3 ORS Advocate - GOVT ADV NL — WP(C)/172/2024

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC020004682024

Filing Number

WP(C)/360/2024

Filing Date

20-Aug-2024

Registration No

WP(C)/172/2024

Registration Date

20-Aug-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10039 - Retirement benefits with respect to State Govt Employees. ( 39 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Of

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMTI. MANNON WANGNAO K AND 42 ORS

    Adv. SUPONGWATI WALLING, ,R ATSULA KIPS

  2. 2.SHRI. SHEILONG KONYAK

  3. 3.SHRI. MANCHING KONYAK

  4. 4.SHRI. SHAHYA KONYAK

  5. 5.SHRI. LEPONG KONYAK

  6. 6.SMTI. NGAMNONPHELIH K.

  7. 7.SMTI. Y. WANTAN K

  8. 8.SHRI. CHONGKI KONYAK

  9. 9.SHRI. KHONGNAK KONYAK

  10. 10.SHRI. TONTHREI KONYAK

  11. 11.SHRI. THROMBO K

  12. 12.SHRI. YOGWAN

  13. 13.SHRI. T. KAIWO K

  14. 14.SHRI. CHINGON KONYAK

  15. 15.SHRI. L. YAPO. K

  16. 16.SHRI. L. EYONG K.

  17. 17.SHRI. HELATANGCHEN KONYAK

  18. 18.SHRI. SHAOPA KONYAK

  19. 19.SHRI. IMLIMEREN

  20. 20.SHRI. KANWANG KONYAK

  21. 21.SHRI. SHONWANG K

  22. 22.SHRI. SANGMEI. K

  23. 23.SHRI. MANJAI. K

  24. 24.SHRI. AYAN KONYAK

  25. 25.SHRI. EJEM YONGSHAK

  26. 26.SHRI. MANPONG K

  27. 27.SHRI. LAICHING K

  28. 28.SHRI. YAKAI

  29. 29.SHRI. CHINGLONG K

  30. 30.SHRI MANLANG KONYAK

  31. 31.SHRI CHINGAO KONYAK

  32. 32.SHRI SANGMEI

  33. 33.SHRI Y. TONGLONG K

  34. 34.SHRI S. SHELLEM KONYAK

  35. 35.SHRI SHEIWANG KONYAK

  36. 36.SHRI C. YAKUP K

  37. 37.SHRI MOMAI K

  38. 38.SHRI TONDAO

  39. 39.SHRI HAMWANG K

  40. 40.SHRI PANONG KONYAK

  41. 41.SHRI NOKNYEI K

  42. 42.SHRI YABAN K

  43. 43.SHRI MANBIN K

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 3 ORS Advocate - GOVT ADV NL

  2. 2.THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY,

  3. 3.THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY,

  4. 4.THE CHIEF ENGINEER,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai SuranaView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(C)/172/2024 The Gauhati High Court (Kohima Bench) disposed of a writ petition filed by 43 work-charged khalasi employees of the Public Health Engineering Department (PHED), Nagaland, seeking regularization of their services. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana found that 33 petitioners had already been granted service regularization and accordingly closed the petition as infructuous for those applicants. One petitioner (No. 42) was denied regularization as he had only 28 years of service at superannuation, falling short of policy requirements. The remaining 9 petitioners remain on a waitlist and were permitted to file representations with concerned authorities when eligible for consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Apr-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaund

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Susmita Phukan KhaundView PDF

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    Admission

    Honble Mr Justice Kardak Ete

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Honble Mr Justice Kardak EteView PDF

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla Longkumer

  8. 13-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla LongkumerView PDF

  9. 12-Feb-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Robin Phukan

  10. 22-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Robin PhukanView PDF

  11. 01-Jan-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Medhi

  12. 04-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar MedhiView PDF

  13. 02-Dec-2025

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Medhi

  14. 11-Nov-2025

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Devashis Baruah

  15. 03-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar MedhiView PDF

  16. 01-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Devashis BaruahView PDF

  17. 21-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla LongkumerView PDF

  18. 21-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla LongkumerView PDF

  19. 14-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Budi HabungView PDF

  20. 05-Jun-2025

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kakheto Sema

  21. 15-May-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kakheto SemaView PDF

  22. 22-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Suman ShyamView PDF

  23. 17-Apr-2025

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kakheto Sema

  24. 27-Mar-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kakheto SemaView PDF

  25. 26-Mar-2025

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Budi Habung

  26. 05-Mar-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Budi HabungView PDF

  27. 04-Mar-2025

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice L.S. Jamir

  28. 11-Feb-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice L.S. JamirView PDF

  29. 07-Feb-2025

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Budi Habung

  30. 17-Jan-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Budi HabungView PDF

  31. 12-Dec-2024

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti Saikia

  32. 21-Nov-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti SaikiaView PDF

  33. 19-Nov-2024

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia

  34. 05-Nov-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Soumitra SaikiaView PDF

  35. 15-Oct-2024

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manish Choudhury

  36. 24-Sep-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manish ChoudhuryView PDF

  37. 20-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  38. 23-Aug-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nelson SailoView PDF

  39. 20-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/172/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(C)/172/2024 The Gauhati High Court (Kohima Bench) disposed of a writ petition filed by 43 work-charged khalasi employees of the Public Health Engineering Department (PHED), Nagaland, seeking regularization of their services. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana found that 33 petitioners had already been granted service regularization and accordingly closed the petition as infructuous for those applicants. One petitioner (No. 42) was denied regularization as he had only 28 years of service at superannuation, falling short of policy requirements. The remaining 9 petitioners remain on a waitlist and were permitted to file representations with concerned authorities when eligible for consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case