SRI DINANATH PRASAD SHAH vs THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 8 ORS Advocate - GOVT ADV NL — WP(C)/69/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 05th May 2026.
CNR: GAHC020002992026
Filing Number
WP(C)/209/2026
Filing Date
04-May-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/69/2026
Registration Date
04-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10120 - Other Tax matters. ( 120 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Of
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SRI DINANATH PRASAD SHAH
Adv. D DAS SR. ADV.,M SOLO,M SOLO, ,LUCY WEO,M SOLO
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 8 ORS Advocate - GOVT ADV NL
-
2.THE COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX
-
3.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAXES
-
4.THE CERTIFICATE OFFICER
-
5.THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
-
6.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE (HQ)
-
7.THE DCP (Deputy Commissioner of Police), DIMAPUR
-
8.M/S SEHBAH ENTERPRISES
-
9.MR. IMNA YANGER IMCHEN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai SuranaView PDF
Case Summary: WP(C)/69/2026 Court Decision: The Gauhati High Court (Kohima Bench) disposed of the petition at the motion stage, staying the arrest warrant against petitioner Dinanath Prasad Shah for ten days. The court directed Shah to file a petition under Section 9 of the Bengal Public Demand Recovery Act, 1913 before the Certificate Officer within ten days, to challenge the sales tax demand on grounds including that the Power of Attorney with the deceased business owner became invalid upon the owner's death in 2016, thus eliminating any financial liability. The court clarified it made no substantive determination on the merits, leaving all issues for independent adjudication by the Certificate Officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/69/2026
Case Summary: WP(C)/69/2026 Court Decision: The Gauhati High Court (Kohima Bench) disposed of the petition at the motion stage, staying the arrest warrant against petitioner Dinanath Prasad Shah for ten days. The court directed Shah to file a petition under Section 9 of the Bengal Public Demand Recovery Act, 1913 before the Certificate Officer within ten days, to challenge the sales tax demand on grounds including that the Power of Attorney with the deceased business owner became invalid upon the owner's death in 2016, thus eliminating any financial liability. The court clarified it made no substantive determination on the merits, leaving all issues for independent adjudication by the Certificate Officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts