M/S CHARLIE SEKHOSE vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS Advocate - CGSC — WP(C)/66/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 14,16,21,299,300A. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on withdrawal with liberty to approach again on 05th May 2026.
CNR: GAHC020002922026
Filing Number
WP(C)/203/2026
Filing Date
27-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/66/2026
Registration Date
30-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10148 - Other settlements relating to settlements made by the State Govt and Other Authorities.. ( 141 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed on withdrawal with liberty to approach again
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S CHARLIE SEKHOSE
Adv. ITALANG RAMLIA,KEKHRIESENUO,KEKHRIESENUO, ,H ZELIANG,KEKHRIESENUO
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS Advocate - CGSC
-
2.THE STATE OF NAGALAND
Adv. GOVT ADV NL,GOVT ADV NL
-
3.THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
-
4.THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
-
5.THE DIRECTOR
-
6.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai SuranaView PDF
The Gauhati High Court (Kohima Bench) dismissed the writ petition filed by M/S Charlie Sekhose, a Class 1 government contractor, against the Union of India and various Nagaland state authorities on May 5, 2026. The petitioner's counsel sought and obtained leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach the court again, and the court allowed this prayer, resulting in dismissal on withdrawal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai SuranaView PDF
-
27-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/66/2026
The Gauhati High Court (Kohima Bench) dismissed the writ petition filed by M/S Charlie Sekhose, a Class 1 government contractor, against the Union of India and various Nagaland state authorities on May 5, 2026. The petitioner's counsel sought and obtained leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach the court again, and the court allowed this prayer, resulting in dismissal on withdrawal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts