M/S PARAGON vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS Advocate - CGSC — WP(C)/65/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 14,16,21,299,300A. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on withdrawal with liberty to approach again on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC020002912026

Filing Number

WP(C)/202/2026

Filing Date

27-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/65/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10148 - Other settlements relating to settlements made by the State Govt and Other Authorities.. ( 141 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed on withdrawal with liberty to approach again

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 14,16,21,299,300A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S PARAGON

    Adv. ITALANG RAMLIA,KEKHRIESENUO,KEKHRIESENUO, ,H ZELIANG,KEKHRIESENUO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS Advocate - CGSC

  2. 2.THE STATE OF NAGALAND

    Adv. GOVT ADV NL,GOVT ADV NL

  3. 3.THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

  4. 4.THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY

  5. 5.THE DIRECTOR

  6. 6.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai SuranaView PDF

    The Gauhati High Court (Kohima Bench) dismissed M/S Paragon's writ petition against the Union of India and Nagaland state authorities on May 5, 2026. The petitioner's counsel sought and obtained leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach the court again, which the court allowed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai SuranaView PDF

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/65/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Gauhati High Court (Kohima Bench) dismissed M/S Paragon's writ petition against the Union of India and Nagaland state authorities on May 5, 2026. The petitioner's counsel sought and obtained leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach the court again, which the court allowed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case