SHRI L. NOKMAN KONYAK vs THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 6 ORS — I.A.(Civil)/67/2026

Case under Xxxxx Section 000. Disposed: --Dismissed on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC020002662026

Filing Number

I.A.(Civil)/186/2026

Filing Date

21-Apr-2026

Registration No

I.A.(Civil)/67/2026

Registration Date

24-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pranjal Das

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pranjal Das

Bench Type

Division Bench

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Dismissed

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Xxxxx Section 000

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRI L. NOKMAN KONYAK

    Adv. ASA RUTSA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 6 ORS

  2. 2.THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY

  3. 3.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

  4. 4.THE ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

  5. 5.THE HEAD DOBASHI

  6. 6.THE MONYIN UNION

  7. 7.SHRI N. SHOMWANG @ SHOMWANG WANGHAM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana,hon'ble Mr. Justice Pranjal DasView PDF

    The Gauhati High Court (Kohima Bench) closed the interlocutory application filed by Shri L. Nokman Konyak against the State of Nagaland and six other respondents on 08.05.2026, stating that the application stood closed in view of an order passed in a connected writ appeal. The judgment provides no substantive ruling on the merits, as the case's resolution was dependent on the outcome of the related writ appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pranjal Das

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/67/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Gauhati High Court (Kohima Bench) closed the interlocutory application filed by Shri L. Nokman Konyak against the State of Nagaland and six other respondents on 08.05.2026, stating that the application stood closed in view of an order passed in a connected writ appeal. The judgment provides no substantive ruling on the merits, as the case's resolution was dependent on the outcome of the related writ appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case