SHRI. L. NOKMAN WANGSHU vs THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 4 ORS — I.A.(Civil)/66/2026

Case under Xxxxx Section 000. Disposed: --Dismissed on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC020002642026

Filing Number

I.A.(Civil)/184/2026

Filing Date

21-Apr-2026

Registration No

I.A.(Civil)/66/2026

Registration Date

24-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pranjal Das

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pranjal Das

Bench Type

Division Bench

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Dismissed

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Xxxxx Section 000

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRI. L. NOKMAN WANGSHU

    Adv. KROVI TSUKRU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 4 ORS

  2. 2.THE HOME COMMISSIONER

  3. 3.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

  4. 4.THE ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

  5. 5.SHRI N. SHOMWANG @ SHOMWANG WANGHAM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana,hon'ble Mr. Justice Pranjal DasView PDF

    The Gauhati High Court (Kohima Bench) closed the interlocutory application filed by Shri L. Nokman Wangshu against the State of Nagaland and others on 08.05.2026, disposing of it in view of an order passed simultaneously in a connected writ appeal. The judgment does not detail the substantive merits or the specific relief granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana,hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar SharmaView PDF

  4. 06-May-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pranjal Das

  5. 21-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/66/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Gauhati High Court (Kohima Bench) closed the interlocutory application filed by Shri L. Nokman Wangshu against the State of Nagaland and others on 08.05.2026, disposing of it in view of an order passed simultaneously in a connected writ appeal. The judgment does not detail the substantive merits or the specific relief granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case