SRI. BISHNU SHARMA vs STATE OF NAGALAND AND ANR — I.A.(Crl.)/10/2026
Case under Xxxxx Section 0000. Disposed: --Disposed Of on 04th May 2026.
CNR: GAHC020000752026
Filing Number
I.A.(Crl.)/21/2026
Filing Date
17-02-2026
Registration No
I.A.(Crl.)/10/2026
Registration Date
17-02-2026
Judge
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA
Coram
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA
Bench Type
Single Bench
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
--Disposed Of
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SRI. BISHNU SHARMA
Adv. MEDO VERO
Respondent(s)
STATE OF NAGALAND AND ANR
SMTI TAKOTOLA
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA
MOTION
MOTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | MOTION |
| 27-02-2026 | MOTION |
Orders
Case Summary: I.A.(Crl.)/10/2026 The Gauhati High Court suspended the sentence imposed on petitioner Bishnu Sharma during the pendency of a connected criminal revision. Sharma had been convicted under IPC Sections 498 and 354, sentenced to one year simple imprisonment, a ₹500 fine, and 15 days additional imprisonment in default. The trial court judgment was upheld by the appellate court, prompting Sharma to file this interim application challenging the appellate order. Justice Sanjeev Kumar Sharma granted relief by suspending sentence execution based on the quantum of punishment and case materials, while allowing the petitioner to remain on previous bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: I.A.(Crl.)/10/2026 The Gauhati High Court suspended the sentence imposed on petitioner Bishnu Sharma during the pendency of a connected criminal revision. Sharma had been convicted under IPC Sections 498 and 354, sentenced to one year simple imprisonment, a ₹500 fine, and 15 days additional imprisonment in default. The trial court judgment was upheld by the appellate court, prompting Sharma to file this interim application challenging the appellate order. Justice Sanjeev Kumar Sharma granted relief by suspending sentence execution based on the quantum of punishment and case materials, while allowing the petitioner to remain on previous bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts