DEEP JYOTI DUTTA AND ANR vs CHANDRA KANTA GOGOI AND ANR Advocate - MR. R GOSWAMI, ,MS. P BORTHAKUR — I.A.(Civil)/693/2026
Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section SEC. 5. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 08th May 2026.
CNR: GAHC010288952025
e-Filing Number
22-12-2025
Filing Number
I.A.(Civil)/16783/2025
Filing Date
22-Dec-2025
Registration No
I.A.(Civil)/693/2026
Registration Date
27-Feb-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Of
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DEEP JYOTI DUTTA AND ANR
Adv. MR. U K DAS
-
2.KAWSHIK DUTTA
Respondent(s)
-
1.CHANDRA KANTA GOGOI AND ANR Advocate - MR. R GOSWAMI, ,MS. P BORTHAKUR
-
2.IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE LIMITED
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar KalitaView PDF
Case Summary: I.A.(Civil)/693/2026 The Gauhati High Court allowed an interlocutory application filed by Deep Jyoti Dutta and Kawshik Dutta seeking condonation of 130 days' delay in preferring an appeal against a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal judgment dated 13.05.2025. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita found sufficient cause for the delay based on grounds stated in paragraphs 3 & 4 of the application, with no objection from the insurance company respondent. The court directed the registry to register the connected MAC appeal and schedule it for admission hearing within a week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Orders
Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita
-
13-Mar-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar KalitaView PDF
-
22-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/693/2026
Case Summary: I.A.(Civil)/693/2026 The Gauhati High Court allowed an interlocutory application filed by Deep Jyoti Dutta and Kawshik Dutta seeking condonation of 130 days' delay in preferring an appeal against a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal judgment dated 13.05.2025. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita found sufficient cause for the delay based on grounds stated in paragraphs 3 & 4 of the application, with no objection from the insurance company respondent. The court directed the registry to register the connected MAC appeal and schedule it for admission hearing within a week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts