SAHIDA BEGUM vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. Advocate - SC, CO OP, ,MR. S ISLAM,A R MONDAL — WP(C)/6990/2024
Case under Constitution of India Section ARTICLE 226. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: GAHC010277462024
Filing Number
WP(C)/15766/2024
Filing Date
20-Dec-2024
Registration No
WP(C)/6990/2024
Registration Date
20-Dec-2024
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10039 - Retirement benefits with respect to State Govt Employees. ( 39 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Last updated 01-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SAHIDA BEGUM
Adv. DR. B N GOGOI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. Advocate - SC, CO OP, ,MR. S ISLAM,A R MONDAL
-
2.THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES,
-
3.THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, ASSAM CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING FEDERATION LIMITED COMPLEX (HOUSEFED)
-
4.SINU BEGUM
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
01-Apr-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF
Case Adjourned In WP(C)/6990/2024 before the Gauhati High Court, the matter has been adjourned for one week as agreed by all parties. The Registry was directed to verify and attach the affidavit-in-opposition filed by respondent No. 4's counsel to the case record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Admission
Honourable Mr. Justice Rajesh Mazumdar
-
11-Mar-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Rajesh MazumdarView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
Admission
Honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik Goswami
-
19-Feb-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik GoswamiView PDF
-
19-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Feb-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik GoswamiView PDF
-
17-Nov-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra SaikiaView PDF
-
21-May-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Suman ShyamView PDF
-
03-Jan-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Suman ShyamView PDF
-
20-Dec-2024
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/6990/2024
Case Adjourned In WP(C)/6990/2024 before the Gauhati High Court, the matter has been adjourned for one week as agreed by all parties. The Registry was directed to verify and attach the affidavit-in-opposition filed by respondent No. 4's counsel to the case record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts