SRI RABINDRA PHUKAN UJJAL CHOUDHURY vs THE STATE OF ASSAM Advocate - PP, ASSAM — I.A.(Crl.)/1394/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415. Disposed: --Disposed Of on 23rd April 2026.

CNR: GAHC010271192025

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

04-12-2025

Filing Number

I.A.(Crl.)/11490/2025

Filing Date

04-12-2025

Registration No

I.A.(Crl.)/1394/2025

Registration Date

29-12-2025

Judge

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA , HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

Coram

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA , HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

10302 - Interlocutory Application (Criminal) ( 383 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

23rd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed Of

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415

Petitioner(s)

SRI RABINDRA PHUKAN UJJAL CHOUDHURY

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF ASSAM Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor), ASSAM

SRI ABHINASH SARKAR

Orders

23-04-2026
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

The Gauhati High Court rejected an application by Sri Rabindra Phukan to suspend his sentence under Section 430(2) BNSS. Phukan had been convicted under Section 4 of the POCSO Act, 2012 read with Section 377 IPC by a Special Judge on 31.03.2022 in a child sexual abuse case. The court found the application could not be allowed at that stage based on the evidence of the victim and Medical Officer, and accordingly rejected it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Gauhati High Court rejected an application by Sri Rabindra Phukan to suspend his sentence under Section 430(2) BNSS. Phukan had been convicted under Section 4 of the POCSO Act, 2012 read with Section 377 IPC by a Special Judge on 31.03.2022 in a child sexual abuse case. The court found the application could not be allowed at that stage based on the evidence of the victim and Medical Officer, and accordingly rejected it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case