AJAY SHANKAR vs PALVE VIJAY TRIMBAK, IFS Advocate - MR. R R Gogoi, ,SC, FOREST — Cont.Cas(C) /641/2025

Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section SEC. 12. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 01st April 2026.

CNR: GAHC010267262025

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

01-12-2025

Filing Number

Cont.Cas(C) /15400/2025

Filing Date

01-12-2025

Registration No

Cont.Cas(C) /641/2025

Registration Date

08-12-2025

Judge

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH

Coram

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10200 - Contempt Petition (Civil). ( 178 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

01st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Of

Acts & Sections

CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 Section SEC. 12
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Section ART. 215

Petitioner(s)

AJAY SHANKAR

Adv. MR. I HAQUE

Respondent(s)

PALVE VIJAY TRIMBAK, IFS Advocate - MR. R R Gogoi, ,SC, FOREST

Hearing History

Judge: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH

01-04-2026

ORDERS

20-02-2026

ORDERS

Orders

01-04-2026
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH

Summary The Gauhati High Court dismissed a contempt of court application filed by Ajay Shankar against the Divisional Forest Officer, Cachar Division. The petitioner had alleged willful violation of a prior order dated 26.09.2025 directing release of a vehicle. However, both the respondent and petitioner's counsel confirmed that the vehicle had been released, and the court consequently dropped the contempt proceedings while preserving the petitioner's right to pursue other available legal remedies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Gauhati High Court dismissed a contempt of court application filed by Ajay Shankar against the Divisional Forest Officer, Cachar Division. The petitioner had alleged willful violation of a prior order dated 26.09.2025 directing release of a vehicle. However, both the respondent and petitioner's counsel confirmed that the vehicle had been released, and the court consequently dropped the contempt proceedings while preserving the petitioner's right to pursue other available legal remedies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case