DHANANJOY DAS vs UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS. Advocate - ASSTT.S.G.I., ,SC, ELECTION COMMISSION.,SC, NRC,SC, F.T — WP(C)/8020/2019
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 01st April 2026.
CNR: GAHC010262672019
Filing Number
WP(C)/15668/2019
Filing Date
25-Oct-2019
Registration No
WP(C)/8020/2019
Registration Date
01-Nov-2019
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana , Honourable Mrs. Justice Shamima Jahan
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana , Honourable Mrs. Justice Shamima Jahan
Category
10176 - Oders of Foreigners Tribunal/Illegal Migrant(D) Tribunal ( 238 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Of
Last updated 01-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DHANANJOY DAS
Adv. MS F AHMED
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS. Advocate - ASSTT.S.G.I., ,SC, ELECTION COMMISSION.,SC, NRC,SC, F.T
-
2.STATE OF ASSAM
-
3.SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (B)
-
4.DY. COMMISSIONER (ELECTION)
-
5.NATIONAL REGISTRATION OF CITIZENS
-
6.ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana,honourable Mrs. Justice Shamima JahanView PDF
The Gauhati High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Dhananjoy Das challenging a Foreigners Tribunal decision, as the petitioner had expired on 20.11.2024 and his family members were unwilling to substitute themselves as petitioners. The court dismissed the petition on abetment after noting the petitioner's counsel's instruction not to press the matter further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2020
Honourable Mr. Justice Suman Shyam,honourable Mr. Justice Hitesh Kumar SarmaView PDF
-
25-Oct-2019
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/8020/2019
The Gauhati High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Dhananjoy Das challenging a Foreigners Tribunal decision, as the petitioner had expired on 20.11.2024 and his family members were unwilling to substitute themselves as petitioners. The court dismissed the petition on abetment after noting the petitioner's counsel's instruction not to press the matter further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts