ANIL CHANDRA KALITA AND 2 ORS. vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 15 ORS Advocate - GA, ASSAM, ,MR. M J GOGOI,MR A K DAS,SC, REVENUE,G UDDIN,MR A K AZAD,P ADHIKARI,MS. P AGARWALA,MS P DEY,MS. V RAI,JYOTISH DAS,MR. S P ROY,MR. H BORA,G UDDIN,P ADHIKARI — WP(C)/6622/2023
Case under Constitution of India Section ARTICLE 226. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: GAHC010255482023
Filing Number
WP(C)/13741/2023
Filing Date
09-Nov-2023
Registration No
WP(C)/6622/2023
Registration Date
15-Nov-2023
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10160 - Other land matters relating to Land Matters. ( 153 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ANIL CHANDRA KALITA AND 2 ORS.
Adv. MR P KALITA,MRS S GOSWAMI,MRS S GOSWAMI, ,MRS S GOSWAMI
-
2.KANAK KALITA
-
3.MOHINI KALITA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 15 ORS Advocate - GA (Government Advocate), ASSAM, ,MR. M J GOGOI,MR A K DAS,SC, REVENUE,G UDDIN,MR A K AZAD,P ADHIKARI,MS. P AGARWALA,MS P DEY,MS. V RAI,JYOTISH DAS,MR. S P ROY,MR. H BORA,G UDDIN,P ADHIKARI
-
2.THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER CUM COLLECTOR,
-
3.THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COMMISSIONER-IN-CHARGE,
-
4.THE CIRCLE OFFICER,
-
5.MD. MINAR ALI
-
6.LUTFAR RAHMAN
-
7.MAKANI BIBI
-
8.HIKMAT ALI
-
9.MD. SAUKAT ALI
-
10.ON THE DEATH OF MD. NAZIRUL ISLAM, HIS LEGAL HEIRS, 10.1 RUMI BEGUM10.
-
11.SARLIN ISLAM10.
-
12.NUR YASMIN ISLAM10.
-
13.NAFIZ IQBAL ISLAM
-
14.SAKIA SULTANA
-
15.KAMAL DAS
-
16.KRISHNA RAM DAS
-
17.ON THE DEATH OF JADAB DAS, HIS LEGAL HEIR, 14.1 BINAPANI DAS14.
-
18.MRINMOI DAS
-
19.BHUPEN DAS
-
20.RAMESH DAS
-
21.SUBHASH BARUAH
-
22.KHAGEN BARUAH
-
23.ANIMA DAS
-
24.MANJU DAS
-
25.MINA BORA
-
26.NIRU DAS
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
08-May-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF
Case Summary: WP(C)/6622/2023 Court: Gauhati High Court Case Status: Adjournment order dated 08.05.2026 Outcome: The petition was adjourned for three weeks. The Revenue Department's standing counsel and State counsel were granted three weeks to file their affidavit-in-opposition. The matter is listed for hearing after three weeks. Some respondents had already filed their affidavits-in-opposition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Dec-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF
-
22-Oct-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Rajesh MazumdarView PDF
-
17-Jul-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Arun Dev ChoudhuryView PDF
-
26-Jun-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Arun Dev ChoudhuryView PDF
-
28-Mar-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Manish ChoudhuryView PDF
-
19-Feb-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Manish ChoudhuryView PDF
-
04-Dec-2024
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF
-
04-Dec-2024
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF
-
27-Nov-2024
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra SaikiaView PDF
-
22-Nov-2024
Joint Registrar (Judl.) Mr. Chinmoy BaruahView PDF
-
05-Apr-2024
Joint Registrar (Judl.) Mr. Chinmoy BaruahView PDF
-
17-Nov-2023
Honourable Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar MedhiView PDF
-
09-Nov-2023
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/6622/2023
Case Summary: WP(C)/6622/2023 Court: Gauhati High Court Case Status: Adjournment order dated 08.05.2026 Outcome: The petition was adjourned for three weeks. The Revenue Department's standing counsel and State counsel were granted three weeks to file their affidavit-in-opposition. The matter is listed for hearing after three weeks. Some respondents had already filed their affidavits-in-opposition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts