AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA vs ROUSHAN ALI AND 7 ORS. — I.A.(Civil)/1787/2026
Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section SEC. 5. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: GAHC010246732025
e-Filing Number
05-11-2025
Filing Number
I.A.(Civil)/14169/2025
Filing Date
06-Nov-2025
Registration No
I.A.(Civil)/1787/2026
Registration Date
27-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Robin Phukan
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Robin Phukan
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA
Adv. MR. R DUBEY,MS. A B KAYASTHA,MS. A B KAYASTHA, ,MS N B KAYASTHA,MR. A N I HUSSAIN,MS. A B KAYASTHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.ROUSHAN ALI AND 7 ORS.
-
2.MD. HAIDAR ALI
-
3.MD. CHAUKAT ALI
-
4.MD. REKAT ALI
-
5.MD. ATOWAR HUSSAIN
-
6.MD. AMZED ALI
-
7.MD. CHAZEDUL ISLAM
-
8.THE COLLECTOR OF KAMRUP (M)
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
01-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Robin PhukanView PDF
Case Summary: The Gauhati High Court issued an interlocutory application order (dated 01.06.2026) in which the Airports Authority of India sought condonement of a 72-day delay in preferring a connected appeal under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The court issued notice to the opposite parties (Roushan Ali and 7 others, including the Collector of Kamrup), returnable in four weeks, with service to be effected via speed post and usual process within one week. The matter was adjourned for further hearing after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/1787/2026
Case Summary: The Gauhati High Court issued an interlocutory application order (dated 01.06.2026) in which the Airports Authority of India sought condonement of a 72-day delay in preferring a connected appeal under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The court issued notice to the opposite parties (Roushan Ali and 7 others, including the Collector of Kamrup), returnable in four weeks, with service to be effected via speed post and usual process within one week. The matter was adjourned for further hearing after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts