CHINMAY KUMAR DAS vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR Advocate - PP, ASSAM, ,MS. P BHATTACHARYA,MS. P MAHANTA — Crl.Pet./1301/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC010237722025

e-Filing Number

24-10-2025

Filing Number

Crl.Pet./10133/2025

Filing Date

24-Oct-2025

Registration No

Crl.Pet./1301/2025

Registration Date

27-Oct-2025

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Pranjal Das

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Pranjal Das

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10263 - Criminal Revisions for quashing of criminal proceeding ( 221 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Of

Last updated 02-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHINMAY KUMAR DAS

    Adv. MR. S K GOSWAMI,MR. N BARMAN,MR. N BARMAN, ,MR. C MAHANTA,MR. N BARMAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor), ASSAM, ,MS. P BHATTACHARYA,MS. P MAHANTA

  2. 2.MITALI DAS ALIAS REKHA DAS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Pranjal DasView PDF

    Summary The Gauhati High Court quashed an FIR filed under Section 69 BNS (sexual intercourse by false promise of marriage) against the petitioner after the complainant-victim settled the dispute with him and affidavit-confirmed her no objection to quashing. Applying the *Gian Singh* precedent, the court found the case fell within the category of relationship disputes with civil flavour where continuation would be abuse of process, particularly given the parties' complete settlement and remote conviction possibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Pranjal DasView PDF

  4. 29-Oct-2025

    Honourable Mrs. Justice Shamima JahanView PDF

  5. 24-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.Pet./1301/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Gauhati High Court quashed an FIR filed under Section 69 BNS (sexual intercourse by false promise of marriage) against the petitioner after the complainant-victim settled the dispute with him and affidavit-confirmed her no objection to quashing. Applying the *Gian Singh* precedent, the court found the case fell within the category of relationship disputes with civil flavour where continuation would be abuse of process, particularly given the parties' complete settlement and remote conviction possibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case