ARIFUL ALI @ INAMUL HOQUE vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR Advocate - PP, ASSAM, ,MS S H BORA — I.A.(Crl.)/1169/2025
Case under Juvenile Justice (care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 Section 9(2). Next hearing: : -.
CNR: GAHC010236132025
Next Hearing
: -
e-Filing Number
22-10-2025
Filing Number
I.A.(Crl.)/10065/2025
Filing Date
23-10-2025
Registration No
I.A.(Crl.)/1169/2025
Registration Date
28-10-2025
Judge
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA , HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Coram
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA , HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
10302 - Interlocutory Application (Criminal) ( 383 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ARIFUL ALI @ INAMUL HOQUE
Adv. MR S K CHHETRY,MR. M ISLAM,MR. M ISLAM, ,MR H R A CHOUDHURY,MR. N UDDIN,MR. M ISLAM
TEPERA @ SAHABUL ALI @ SAHABUL HOQUE
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor), ASSAM, ,MS S H BORA
NASIMA BIBI
Orders
Case Summary: I.A.(Crl.)/1169/2025 The Gauhati High Court adjourned the matter to 11.06.2026 without deciding the substantive petition. The applicant Ariful Ali, convicted of rape under Section 376(D) IPC in 2025, sought declaration as a juvenile by claiming his actual name is Inamul Hoque. The court granted six weeks for the State to file written objections, noting the identity claim was never raised during trial and directing examination of the bail bond to verify the name discrepancy before considering the juvenility plea. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: I.A.(Crl.)/1169/2025 The Gauhati High Court adjourned the matter to 11.06.2026 without deciding the substantive petition. The applicant Ariful Ali, convicted of rape under Section 376(D) IPC in 2025, sought declaration as a juvenile by claiming his actual name is Inamul Hoque. The court granted six weeks for the State to file written objections, noting the identity claim was never raised during trial and directing examination of the bail bond to verify the name discrepancy before considering the juvenility plea. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts