NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD vs MST MORZINA KHATUN AND 5 ORS Advocate - MR A N IQBAL — MACApp./596/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 14th March 2026.
CNR: GAHC010235722024
Filing Number
MACApp./13302/2024
Filing Date
07-Nov-2024
Registration No
MACApp./596/2024
Registration Date
16-Nov-2024
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar Sharma
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar Sharma
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10223 - Appeals from motor accident claims tribunal. ( 191 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Of
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD
Adv. MR. K K BHATTA,MRS L SHARMA,MRS L SHARMA, ,MRS L SHARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.MST MORZINA KHATUN AND 5 ORS Advocate - MR A N IQBAL
-
2.MISS IKTARA KHATUN
-
3.MISS MALIKA
-
4.MD. ALI HUSSAIN
-
5.MUSST. AKLIMA KHATUN
-
6.MD. EKRAMUL HUSSAIN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-May-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar SharmaView PDF
The Gauhati High Court corrected clerical errors in a National Lok-Adalat order regarding compensation in a motor accident claim. The court clarified that Rs. 9,70,000 already deposited by National Insurance Company must be released to the deceased's widow (claimant No. 1), deleting confusing language about FDR deposits and remaining amounts that had created ambiguity in the original March 14, 2026 order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar SharmaView PDF
-
20-Nov-2024
Honourable Mrs. Justice Malasri NandiView PDF
-
07-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. MACApp./596/2024
The Gauhati High Court corrected clerical errors in a National Lok-Adalat order regarding compensation in a motor accident claim. The court clarified that Rs. 9,70,000 already deposited by National Insurance Company must be released to the deceased's widow (claimant No. 1), deleting confusing language about FDR deposits and remaining amounts that had created ambiguity in the original March 14, 2026 order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts