FARID ALI vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS Advocate - GA, ASSAM, ,MR M R ADHIKARI,MS. A VERMA,MR. S S ROY — W.P.(Crl.)/81/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 23rd April 2026.
CNR: GAHC010211762025
e-Filing Number
15-09-2025
Filing Number
W.P.(Crl.)/9040/2025
Filing Date
15-Sep-2025
Registration No
W.P.(Crl.)/81/2025
Registration Date
02-Dec-2025
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana , Honourable Mrs. Justice Shamima Jahan
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana , Honourable Mrs. Justice Shamima Jahan
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
10190 - Habeas Corpus - Non-production of a person before the Magistrate after arrest ( 173 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
23-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Of
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.FARID ALI
Adv. MR. A M AHMED,MRS S RAHANA,MRS S RAHANA, ,P. GHOSH,B DAS,MRS S RAHANA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS Advocate - GA (Government Advocate), ASSAM, ,MR M R ADHIKARI,MS. A VERMA,MR. S S ROY
-
2.THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
-
3.THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
-
4.THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
-
5.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
-
6.THE SPECIAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (BORDER)
-
7.THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE
-
8.THE UNION OF INDIA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Apr-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana,honourable Mrs. Justice Shamima JahanView PDF
Case Summary: W.P.(Crl.)/81/2025 - Farid Ali v. State of Assam Court Decision: The Gauhati High Court dismissed the writ petition. The court held that the government has absolute authority to expel declared foreign nationals regardless of extradition treaties, and that such individuals do not possess constitutional safeguards available to Indian citizens, including the right to be produced before a magistrate or notified to family. Key Facts: Petitioner's father, Md. Mahib Ali, was declared a foreigner by tribunal in 2012 and detained in May 2025. He was subsequently expelled to Bangladesh in late May 2025. The petitioner challenged the legality of custody and expulsion, alleging violation of Articles 21-22 of the Constitution. Reasoning: The court emphasized that declared foreign nationals have limited constitutional protections and that India's government possesses unfettered expulsion power under the Foreigners Act, 1946, independent of bilateral agreements with other nations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Apr-2026
Motion
Honourable Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana , Honourable Mrs. Justice Shamima Jahan
-
06-Apr-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana,honourable Mrs. Justice Shamima JahanView PDF
-
17-Feb-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana,honourable Mrs. Justice Susmita Phukan KhaundView PDF
-
17-Feb-2026
Motion
Honourable Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana , Honourable Mr. Justice Anjan Moni Kalita
-
10-Feb-2026
Motion
Honourable Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana , Honourable Mr. Justice Anjan Moni Kalita
-
28-Jan-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana,honourable Mr. Justice Anjan Moni KalitaView PDF
-
28-Jan-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana,honourable Mr. Justice Anjan Moni KalitaView PDF
-
28-Jan-2026
Motion
Honourable Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana , Honourable Mrs. Justice Shamima Jahan
-
15-Dec-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana,honourable Mrs. Justice Shamima JahanView PDF
-
15-Dec-2025
Motion
Honourable Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana , Honourable Mrs. Justice Shamima Jahan
-
10-Dec-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana,honourable Mrs. Justice Shamima JahanView PDF
-
10-Dec-2025
Motion
Honourable Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana , Honourable Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla Longkumer
-
05-Dec-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana,honourable Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla LongkumerView PDF
-
05-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Dec-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana,honourable Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla LongkumerView PDF
-
15-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. W.P.(Crl.)/81/2025
Case Summary: W.P.(Crl.)/81/2025 - Farid Ali v. State of Assam Court Decision: The Gauhati High Court dismissed the writ petition. The court held that the government has absolute authority to expel declared foreign nationals regardless of extradition treaties, and that such individuals do not possess constitutional safeguards available to Indian citizens, including the right to be produced before a magistrate or notified to family. Key Facts: Petitioner's father, Md. Mahib Ali, was declared a foreigner by tribunal in 2012 and detained in May 2025. He was subsequently expelled to Bangladesh in late May 2025. The petitioner challenged the legality of custody and expulsion, alleging violation of Articles 21-22 of the Constitution. Reasoning: The court emphasized that declared foreign nationals have limited constitutional protections and that India's government possesses unfettered expulsion power under the Foreigners Act, 1946, independent of bilateral agreements with other nations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts