DIPOK SAIKIA vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS Advocate - SC, ELEM. EDU, ,GA, ASSAM — WP(C)/7311/2021

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Closed on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC010207322021

Filing Number

WP(C)/11177/2021

Filing Date

01-Dec-2021

Registration No

WP(C)/7311/2021

Registration Date

27-Dec-2021

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10098 - Provincialisation of staff of schools ( 98 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Closed

Last updated 01-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DIPOK SAIKIA

    Adv. MR J PAYENG

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS Advocate - SC, ELEM. EDU, ,GA, ASSAM

  2. 2.THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION,

  3. 3.THE DIST. ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER,

  4. 4.THE BLOCK ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER,

  5. 5.DISTRICT SCRUTINY COMMITTEE FOR ELEMENTARY EDUCATION,

  6. 6.PRADIP KR. BORGOHAIN,

  7. 7.SMT. JAYA RAJBONGSHI,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF

    Summary The Gauhati High Court closed the writ petition filed by Dipok Saikia against the State of Assam and education officials as the matter had become infructuous (no longer capable of producing practical relief). The petitioner's counsel submitted that the circumstances had changed, making the case no longer viable for adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-May-2025

    Deputy Registrar (Bench) - Mr. Saptarshi DasView PDF

  4. 03-Jan-2022

    Honourable Mr. Justice Achintya Malla Bujor BaruaView PDF

  5. 01-Dec-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/7311/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Gauhati High Court closed the writ petition filed by Dipok Saikia against the State of Assam and education officials as the matter had become infructuous (no longer capable of producing practical relief). The petitioner's counsel submitted that the circumstances had changed, making the case no longer viable for adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case