SAILEN KUMAR SHARMA vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS. Advocate - SC, WATER RESOURCE — WP(C)/5513/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: GAHC010206782025
e-Filing Number
09-09-2025
Filing Number
WP(C)/11835/2025
Filing Date
09-Sep-2025
Registration No
WP(C)/5513/2025
Registration Date
17-Sep-2025
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Devashis Baruah
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Devashis Baruah
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10180 - Award of contracts by the State or its instrumentalities ( 172 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SAILEN KUMAR SHARMA
Adv. MR S SARMA,MS. M SHARMA,MS. M SHARMA, ,MS. M SHARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS. Advocate - SC, WATER RESOURCE
-
2.THE CHIEF ENGINEER,
-
3.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
04-May-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Devashis BaruahView PDF
Case Summary: WP(C)/5513/2025 Case: Sailen Kumar Sharma v. The State of Assam & 2 Ors. Court: Gauhati High Court Order Date: 04.05.2026 Outcome: The case was adjourned. The court noted that the Ministry of Jal Shakti and Brahmaputra Board are necessary parties to the proceedings as they are partly responsible for making payments. The petitioner's counsel agreed to file an application seeking impleadment of these parties, and the matter was listed for hearing upon such application being filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Admission
Honourable Mr. Justice Manish Choudhury
-
23-Mar-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Manish ChoudhuryView PDF
-
15-Dec-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF
-
15-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Sep-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Devashis BaruahView PDF
-
09-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/5513/2025
Case Summary: WP(C)/5513/2025 Case: Sailen Kumar Sharma v. The State of Assam & 2 Ors. Court: Gauhati High Court Order Date: 04.05.2026 Outcome: The case was adjourned. The court noted that the Ministry of Jal Shakti and Brahmaputra Board are necessary parties to the proceedings as they are partly responsible for making payments. The petitioner's counsel agreed to file an application seeking impleadment of these parties, and the matter was listed for hearing upon such application being filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts