SOVEN MIKIR vs SRI NALIN MIKIR ANR 9 ORS Advocate - MR D TALUKDAR, ,MR A UPADHYAY,MS. JYOTI CHETRY,MR P UPADHYAY,MR P CHOWDHURY — I.A.(Civil)/3036/2025
Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 05th May 2026.
CNR: GAHC010205302025
e-Filing Number
08-09-2025
Filing Number
I.A.(Civil)/11763/2025
Filing Date
08-Sep-2025
Registration No
I.A.(Civil)/3036/2025
Registration Date
10-Sep-2025
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Robin Phukan
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Robin Phukan
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Of
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SOVEN MIKIR
Adv. MR. B D DEKA,N CHAUDHURY,N CHAUDHURY, ,MR. A BHATRA,MR. A DEKA,MR. M DAS,N CHAUDHURY
Respondent(s)
-
1.SRI NALIN MIKIR ANR 9 ORS Advocate - MR D TALUKDAR, ,MR A UPADHYAY,MS. JYOTI CHETRY,MR P UPADHYAY,MR P CHOWDHURY
-
2.SRI MUNINDRA MIKIR
-
3.SMTI RANGMILI MIKIR
-
4.THE KHEPANIJAL GAON UNNAYAN SAMITEE
-
5.SRI JOGEN BEY
-
6.SRI DHARMESWAR TUMUNG
-
7.SRI GAJEN BEY
-
8.SRI PULIN MIKIR
-
9.SRI INDRA MIKIR
-
10.SMTI BENU MIKIR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Robin PhukanView PDF
Case Summary: I.A.(Civil)/3036/2025 - SOVEN MIKIR v. SRI NALIN MIKIR & ORS Court's Decision: The Gauhati High Court dismissed the applicant's application for condonation of 215 days delay in filing a review petition against a December 2024 RFA judgment. Justice Robin Phukan found the applicant lacked clean hands, having suppressed material facts and made false statements before the Supreme Court about his party status in the original appeal. Key Reasoning: The court held that despite legal principles favoring substantial justice, the applicant failed to provide judicially acceptable grounds for the delay. Critical findings included: (1) the applicant was already impleaded as Respondent No. 6 in the RFA but concealed this from the Supreme Court; (2) he demonstrated gross negligence and lack of bona fides; and (3) he suppressed that he had already appeared through counsel and the impleadment application was closed because relief had materialized. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Mar-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Robin PhukanView PDF
-
24-Mar-2026
Orders
Honourable Mr. Justice Robin Phukan
-
27-Feb-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Robin PhukanView PDF
-
27-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Feb-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Robin PhukanView PDF
-
13-Oct-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Robin PhukanView PDF
-
08-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/3036/2025
Case Summary: I.A.(Civil)/3036/2025 - SOVEN MIKIR v. SRI NALIN MIKIR & ORS Court's Decision: The Gauhati High Court dismissed the applicant's application for condonation of 215 days delay in filing a review petition against a December 2024 RFA judgment. Justice Robin Phukan found the applicant lacked clean hands, having suppressed material facts and made false statements before the Supreme Court about his party status in the original appeal. Key Reasoning: The court held that despite legal principles favoring substantial justice, the applicant failed to provide judicially acceptable grounds for the delay. Critical findings included: (1) the applicant was already impleaded as Respondent No. 6 in the RFA but concealed this from the Supreme Court; (2) he demonstrated gross negligence and lack of bona fides; and (3) he suppressed that he had already appeared through counsel and the impleadment application was closed because relief had materialized. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts