SOVEN MIKIR vs SRI NALIN MIKIR ANR 9 ORS Advocate - MR D TALUKDAR, ,MR A UPADHYAY,MS. JYOTI CHETRY,MR P UPADHYAY,MR P CHOWDHURY — I.A.(Civil)/3036/2025

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC010205302025

e-Filing Number

08-09-2025

Filing Number

I.A.(Civil)/11763/2025

Filing Date

08-Sep-2025

Registration No

I.A.(Civil)/3036/2025

Registration Date

10-Sep-2025

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Robin Phukan

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Robin Phukan

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Of

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SOVEN MIKIR

    Adv. MR. B D DEKA,N CHAUDHURY,N CHAUDHURY, ,MR. A BHATRA,MR. A DEKA,MR. M DAS,N CHAUDHURY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SRI NALIN MIKIR ANR 9 ORS Advocate - MR D TALUKDAR, ,MR A UPADHYAY,MS. JYOTI CHETRY,MR P UPADHYAY,MR P CHOWDHURY

  2. 2.SRI MUNINDRA MIKIR

  3. 3.SMTI RANGMILI MIKIR

  4. 4.THE KHEPANIJAL GAON UNNAYAN SAMITEE

  5. 5.SRI JOGEN BEY

  6. 6.SRI DHARMESWAR TUMUNG

  7. 7.SRI GAJEN BEY

  8. 8.SRI PULIN MIKIR

  9. 9.SRI INDRA MIKIR

  10. 10.SMTI BENU MIKIR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Robin PhukanView PDF

    Case Summary: I.A.(Civil)/3036/2025 - SOVEN MIKIR v. SRI NALIN MIKIR & ORS Court's Decision: The Gauhati High Court dismissed the applicant's application for condonation of 215 days delay in filing a review petition against a December 2024 RFA judgment. Justice Robin Phukan found the applicant lacked clean hands, having suppressed material facts and made false statements before the Supreme Court about his party status in the original appeal. Key Reasoning: The court held that despite legal principles favoring substantial justice, the applicant failed to provide judicially acceptable grounds for the delay. Critical findings included: (1) the applicant was already impleaded as Respondent No. 6 in the RFA but concealed this from the Supreme Court; (2) he demonstrated gross negligence and lack of bona fides; and (3) he suppressed that he had already appeared through counsel and the impleadment application was closed because relief had materialized. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Robin PhukanView PDF

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Honourable Mr. Justice Robin Phukan

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Robin PhukanView PDF

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Robin PhukanView PDF

  8. 13-Oct-2025

    Honourable Mr. Justice Robin PhukanView PDF

  9. 08-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/3036/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: I.A.(Civil)/3036/2025 - SOVEN MIKIR v. SRI NALIN MIKIR & ORS Court's Decision: The Gauhati High Court dismissed the applicant's application for condonation of 215 days delay in filing a review petition against a December 2024 RFA judgment. Justice Robin Phukan found the applicant lacked clean hands, having suppressed material facts and made false statements before the Supreme Court about his party status in the original appeal. Key Reasoning: The court held that despite legal principles favoring substantial justice, the applicant failed to provide judicially acceptable grounds for the delay. Critical findings included: (1) the applicant was already impleaded as Respondent No. 6 in the RFA but concealed this from the Supreme Court; (2) he demonstrated gross negligence and lack of bona fides; and (3) he suppressed that he had already appeared through counsel and the impleadment application was closed because relief had materialized. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case