ON THE DEATH OF SHRI RAJEN GOSWAMI , vs SRI KANAK CH. DEKA AND ORS — I.A.(Civil)/3072/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order22Rule9(2)ReadwithOrder22Rule3. Disposed: --Disposed Of on 08th May 2026.
CNR: GAHC010204772025
e-Filing Number
06-09-2025
Filing Number
I.A.(Civil)/11735/2025
Filing Date
06-Sep-2025
Registration No
I.A.(Civil)/3072/2025
Registration Date
15-Sep-2025
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik Goswami
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik Goswami
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--Disposed Of
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ON THE DEATH OF SHRI RAJEN GOSWAMI ,
Adv. MR. S P ROY,MS. P AGARWALA,MS. P AGARWALA, ,JYOTISH DAS,MS. V RAI,MS. P AGARWALA1.
-
2.SMTI TARUNI GOSWAMI1.
-
3.SMTI ANANDITA GOSWAMI1.
-
4.SMTI PIKUMANI GOSWAMI
-
5.SRI PARESH GOSWAMI
-
6.SMTI BHARATI GOSWAMI
-
7.SRI MAHENDRA GOSWAMI
-
8.SHRI BUDHU GOSWAMI
Respondent(s)
-
1.SRI KANAK CH. DEKA AND ORS
-
2.SRI RANJIT DEKA
-
3.SRI DANDA DEKA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik GoswamiView PDF
Case Summary: I.A.(Civil)/3072/2025 Court Decision: The Gauhati High Court set aside the abatement of RSA No.217/2011 caused by appellant Rajen Goswami's death on 30.10.2021, allowing his three legal heirs (wife Taruni Goswami and daughters Anandita and Pikumani Goswami) to be substituted as parties to the appeal. The court found no deliberate or mala fide delay in bringing the heirs on record and noted the respondents had no objection to the substitution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/3072/2025
Case Summary: I.A.(Civil)/3072/2025 Court Decision: The Gauhati High Court set aside the abatement of RSA No.217/2011 caused by appellant Rajen Goswami's death on 30.10.2021, allowing his three legal heirs (wife Taruni Goswami and daughters Anandita and Pikumani Goswami) to be substituted as parties to the appeal. The court found no deliberate or mala fide delay in bringing the heirs on record and noted the respondents had no objection to the substitution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts