RAM GOPAL PRASAD vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS. Advocate - SC, HIGHER EDU, ,SC, G U,SC, FINANCE — WP(C)/5354/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section ART. 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 05th May 2026.
CNR: GAHC010204322025
e-Filing Number
05-09-2025
Filing Number
WP(C)/11712/2025
Filing Date
06-Sep-2025
Registration No
WP(C)/5354/2025
Registration Date
09-Sep-2025
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Nelson Sailo
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Nelson Sailo
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10017 - Retirement benefits with respect to Service of Teachers of Provincialized Schools. ( 17 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Of
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAM GOPAL PRASAD
Adv. S YESMIN,MR. A HUDA,MR. A HUDA, ,MR P R SARMA,MR D MEDHI,MR. A HUDA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS. Advocate - SC, HIGHER EDU, ,SC, G U,SC, FINANCE
-
2.THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION
-
3.THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, GOVT OF ASSAM, FINANCE DEPARTMENT
-
4.THE REGISTRAR, GAUHATI UNIVERSITY
-
5.THE VICE CHANCELLOR, GAUHATI UNIVERSITY
-
6.THE FINANCE OFFICER, GAUHATI UNIVERSITY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Nelson SailoView PDF
The Gauhati High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Ram Gopal Prasad, a terminated Gauhati University employee, finding that his challenge to the university's November 2025 speaking order rejecting his claims for subsistence allowance arrears and 4 KVPs was procedurally improper. The court held that since the university had already passed a reasoned speaking order addressing his representation (as directed in earlier litigation), the petitioner must challenge that order through appropriate legal proceedings rather than by filing a counter-affidavit. Liberty was granted to pursue proper remedies if advised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
Motion
Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan Nair
-
07-Apr-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan NairView PDF
-
09-Feb-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF
-
09-Feb-2026
Motion
Honourable Mr. Justice Nelson Sailo
-
09-Jan-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Nelson SailoView PDF
-
09-Jan-2026
Motion
Honourable Mr. Justice Nelson Sailo
-
17-Dec-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Nelson SailoView PDF
-
10-Nov-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Robin PhukanView PDF
-
10-Nov-2025
Motion
Honourable Mr. Justice Nelson Sailo
-
27-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Sep-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Robin PhukanView PDF
-
06-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/5354/2025
The Gauhati High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Ram Gopal Prasad, a terminated Gauhati University employee, finding that his challenge to the university's November 2025 speaking order rejecting his claims for subsistence allowance arrears and 4 KVPs was procedurally improper. The court held that since the university had already passed a reasoned speaking order addressing his representation (as directed in earlier litigation), the petitioner must challenge that order through appropriate legal proceedings rather than by filing a counter-affidavit. Liberty was granted to pursue proper remedies if advised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts