SMT MONALISA KALITA AND 3 ORS vs M/S B.L. AGARWALA AND 2 ORS Advocate - MR G JALAN, ,MR SISHIR DUTTA,MS. M CHOUDHURY,S K BEGUM — I.A.(Civil)/2830/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER 41, RULE 3(A). Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 20th May 2026.
CNR: GAHC010191162023
Filing Number
I.A.(Civil)/10300/2023
Filing Date
24-Aug-2023
Registration No
I.A.(Civil)/2830/2023
Registration Date
18-Sep-2023
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
20-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Of
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMT MONALISA KALITA AND 3 ORS
Adv. MR. R P ROY,MR J ISLAM,MR J ISLAM, ,MR J ISLAM
-
2.SRI DHIRENDRA NATH KALITA @ DHIREN CH. KALITA,
-
3.MISS ANGANA KALITA,
-
4.SRI NILUTPAL KALITA,
Respondent(s)
-
1.M/S B.L. AGARWALA AND 2 ORS Advocate - MR G JALAN, ,MR SISHIR DUTTA,MS. M CHOUDHURY,S K BEGUM
-
2.SRI JAWAHIR RAWAT
-
3.THE BRANCH MANAGER
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-May-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar KalitaView PDF
Case Summary: I.A.(Civil)/2830/2023 Court Decision: The Gauhati High Court allowed the interlocutory application filed by the heirs of Late Pulin Kalita and condoned a 61-day delay in preferring their restoration application for a Motor Accident Claims appeal. The court found sufficient cause for the delay and waived notice to the vehicle driver (respondent No. 2), as he may not be required for deciding the appeal on compensation quantum. The case is listed for further hearing on 15.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Jun-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Robin PhukanView PDF
-
05-Jun-2024
Honourable Mrs. Justice Marli VankungView PDF
-
24-Aug-2023
Case filed
Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/2830/2023
Case Summary: I.A.(Civil)/2830/2023 Court Decision: The Gauhati High Court allowed the interlocutory application filed by the heirs of Late Pulin Kalita and condoned a 61-day delay in preferring their restoration application for a Motor Accident Claims appeal. The court found sufficient cause for the delay and waived notice to the vehicle driver (respondent No. 2), as he may not be required for deciding the appeal on compensation quantum. The case is listed for further hearing on 15.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts