STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS vs SAURAV PRAN SHARMA Advocate - MR. N K KALITA — I.A.(Civil)/2827/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --Disposed Of on 01st April 2026.
CNR: GAHC010189262025
e-Filing Number
20-08-2025
Filing Number
I.A.(Civil)/10881/2025
Filing Date
20-Aug-2025
Registration No
I.A.(Civil)/2827/2025
Registration Date
27-Aug-2025
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Devashis Baruah
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Devashis Baruah
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
--Disposed Of
Last updated 02-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS
Adv. MRS S BARUAH,JR. GA, ASSAM,JR. GA, ASSAM, ,JR. GA, ASSAM
-
2.THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
Adv. SIMANTINI BARUAH
-
3.THE SECRETARY
Adv. SIMANTINI BARUAH
-
4.THE SECRETARY
Adv. SIMANTINI BARUAH
-
5.THE JOINT SECRETARY
Adv. SIMANTINI BARUAH
-
6.THE ENQUITY OFFICER
Adv. SIMANTINI BARUAH
Respondent(s)
-
1.SAURAV PRAN SHARMA Advocate - MR. N K KALITA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Devashis BaruahView PDF
-
07-Mar-2026
Category B - Challenge To Simultaneous Continuation Of Disciplinary Proceedings And Criminal Trial
Honourable Mr. Justice Devashis Baruah
-
11-Feb-2026
Category B - Challenge To Simultaneous Continuation Of Disciplinary Proceedings And Criminal Trial
Honourable Mr. Justice Devashis Baruah
-
29-Jan-2026
Category B - Challenge To Simultaneous Continuation Of Disciplinary Proceedings And Criminal Trial
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia
-
02-Dec-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra SaikiaView PDF
-
02-Dec-2025
Category B - Challenge To Simultaneous Continuation Of Disciplinary Proceedings And Criminal Trial
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia
-
30-Oct-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra SaikiaView PDF
-
30-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/2827/2025
Summary The Gauhati High Court's judgment sets aside the Commission of Inquiry's findings against candidates in APSC's 2013 and 2014 combined competitive examinations for violating Sections 8B and 8C of the Commission of Inquiry Act, 1952 (failure to provide statutory procedural safeguards). While the reports cannot be used to initiate disciplinary proceedings against the petitioners, the court permits the state to continue proceedings on other independent evidence while directing periodic review of suspension orders within 45 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts