UJJAL KUMAR DAS vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS Advocate - GA, ASSAM, ,SC, SEC. EDU. — WP(C)/5914/2021
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 24th March 2026.
CNR: GAHC010184742021
Filing Number
WP(C)/9923/2021
Filing Date
02-Nov-2021
Registration No
WP(C)/5914/2021
Registration Date
08-Nov-2021
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10017 - Retirement benefits with respect to Service of Teachers of Provincialized Schools. ( 17 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Of
Last updated 03-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.UJJAL KUMAR DAS
Adv. MRS. K DEVI,MR J ABEDIN,MR J ABEDIN, ,MS S A KHALIFA,MR J ABEDIN
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS Advocate - GA (Government Advocate), ASSAM, ,SC, SEC. EDU.
-
2.THE DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION,
-
3.THE DIRECTOR OF PENSION,
-
4.THE INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF
The Gauhati High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Ujjal Kumar Das against the State of Assam and related education authorities on 24.03.2026, as the petitioner's grievance had been redressed. The petition was closed as infructuous since the relief sought was no longer necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Apr-2024
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra SaikiaView PDF
-
29-Nov-2023
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra SaikiaView PDF
-
23-Mar-2022
Honourable Mr. Justice Achintya Malla Bujor BaruaView PDF
-
10-Nov-2021
Honourable Mr. Justice Achintya Malla Bujor BaruaView PDF
-
02-Nov-2021
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/5914/2021
The Gauhati High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Ujjal Kumar Das against the State of Assam and related education authorities on 24.03.2026, as the petitioner's grievance had been redressed. The petition was closed as infructuous since the relief sought was no longer necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts