CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD vs NILIMA KHATUN AND 4 ORS Advocate - A R MONDAL, ,MR. S ISLAM — I.A.(Civil)/3233/2024

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: GAHC010178622024

Filing Number

I.A.(Civil)/9997/2024

Filing Date

29-Aug-2024

Registration No

I.A.(Civil)/3233/2024

Registration Date

22-Oct-2024

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD

    Adv. MR. A BHATTACHARYYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NILIMA KHATUN AND 4 ORS Advocate - A R MONDAL, ,MR. S ISLAM

  2. 2.BABIDUL ISLAM

  3. 3.SANIDUL ISLAM

  4. 4.SAMSUL HAQUE

  5. 5.DELOWAR HUSSAIN

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-May-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar KalitaView PDF

    Case Summary: I.A.(Civil)/3233/2024 Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Co Ltd v. Nilima Khatun and 4 Ors The Gauhati High Court, on 20.05.2026, allowed the petitioner's application for substituted service of notice. The postal notice to respondent No. 4 was returned undelivered ("Addressee left. Return to sender"), and the court permitted the petitioner to serve notice via newspaper publication at the respondent's last known address. The case was adjourned to 22.07.2026 for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Feb-2026

    Honourable Mrs. Justice Mitali ThakuriaView PDF

  4. 28-Oct-2024

    Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF

  5. 29-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/3233/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: I.A.(Civil)/3233/2024 Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Co Ltd v. Nilima Khatun and 4 Ors The Gauhati High Court, on 20.05.2026, allowed the petitioner's application for substituted service of notice. The postal notice to respondent No. 4 was returned undelivered ("Addressee left. Return to sender"), and the court permitted the petitioner to serve notice via newspaper publication at the respondent's last known address. The case was adjourned to 22.07.2026 for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case