SAIDUL HAQUE vs HASAN ALI AND 2 ORS Advocate - MRS. S ROY, ,MRS. S ROY,MS. U ROY — MACApp./495/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: GAHC010171652024

Filing Number

MACApp./9608/2024

Filing Date

20-Aug-2024

Registration No

MACApp./495/2024

Registration Date

17-Sep-2024

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar Kalita

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10223 - Appeals from motor accident claims tribunal. ( 191 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAIDUL HAQUE

    Adv. MR. K BHATTACHARJEE,MS T BARUAH,MS T BARUAH, ,ABBASH U AHMED,MS. A BARMAN,MS T BARUAH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HASAN ALI AND 2 ORS Advocate - MRS. S ROY, ,MRS. S ROY,MS. U ROY

  2. 2.MD. SAHEB UDDIN,

  3. 3.NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-May-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar KalitaView PDF

    Case Summary: MACApp./495/2024 The Gauhati High Court adjourned the matter for two weeks after finding that notice to Respondent No. 1 (Hasan Ali) could not be properly served due to an incorrect address ("no such person" postal remark), while notices to Respondents 2 and 3 were duly served. The appellant's counsel was granted time to locate the correct address of Respondent No. 1. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Sep-2024

    Honourable Mr. Justice Mridul Kumar KalitaView PDF

  4. 20-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. MACApp./495/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MACApp./495/2024 The Gauhati High Court adjourned the matter for two weeks after finding that notice to Respondent No. 1 (Hasan Ali) could not be properly served due to an incorrect address ("no such person" postal remark), while notices to Respondents 2 and 3 were duly served. The appellant's counsel was granted time to locate the correct address of Respondent No. 1. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case