LABAN MOHAN vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS Advocate - GA, ASSAM, ,SC, HIGHER EDU,SC, FINANCE — WP(C)/4422/2023
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 01st April 2026.
CNR: GAHC010169242023
Filing Number
WP(C)/9062/2023
Filing Date
01-Aug-2023
Registration No
WP(C)/4422/2023
Registration Date
02-Aug-2023
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan Nair
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan Nair
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10020 - Other service matters with respect to Service of Teachers of Provincialized Schools. ( 20 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Of
Last updated 01-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LABAN MOHAN
Adv. MR. R C SAIKIA,MS. N DEY,MS. N DEY, ,MS. K SAIKIA,MS. N DEY
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS Advocate - GA (Government Advocate), ASSAM, ,SC, HIGHER EDU,SC, FINANCE
-
2.THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
-
3.THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
-
4.THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
-
5.THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION
-
6.INSPECTOR OF COLLEGE
-
7.SONARI COMMERCE COLLEGE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan NairView PDF
The Gauhati High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Laban Mohan against the State of Assam and other educational authorities on April 1, 2026, after the petitioner sought withdrawal of the case. The respondents did not object to the withdrawal, and the court accordingly allowed the dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Mar-2026
Joint Registrar (Judl.) Mr. Chinmoy BaruahView PDF
-
16-Oct-2023
Honourable Mr. Justice Achintya Malla Bujor BaruaView PDF
-
04-Aug-2023
Honourable Mr. Justice Lanusungkum JamirView PDF
-
01-Aug-2023
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/4422/2023
The Gauhati High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Laban Mohan against the State of Assam and other educational authorities on April 1, 2026, after the petitioner sought withdrawal of the case. The respondents did not object to the withdrawal, and the court accordingly allowed the dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts