RAHOM ALI AHMED vs THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS Advocate - SC, SEC. EDU., ,MR. D A KAIYUM,MR. RASHIDUL ISLAM,MRS B B AHMED,MR Z HUSSAIN,MR B KAUSHIK,MR. S HAZARIKA,MS A M DCOSTA,B SAHA,MR. C CHAKRAVARTY,MR D DAS,MR A I TALUKDAR,MR. S K DAS,MR H K DAS,MR N K SARMA,MS D MAHANTA — WP(C)/4387/2023
Case under Constitution of India Section ART. 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 05th May 2026.
CNR: GAHC010158012023
Filing Number
WP(C)/8473/2023
Filing Date
20-Jul-2023
Registration No
WP(C)/4387/2023
Registration Date
01-Aug-2023
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Robin Phukan
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Robin Phukan
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10003 - Selection and appointment with respect to Service of Teachers of Provincialized Schools. ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Of
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAHOM ALI AHMED
Adv. MR. K N CHOUDHURY,MR. Y ALI,MR. Y ALI, ,MR. A ALI,MR. Y ALI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS Advocate - SC, SEC. EDU., ,MR. D A KAIYUM,MR. RASHIDUL ISLAM,MRS B B AHMED,MR Z HUSSAIN,MR B KAUSHIK,MR. S HAZARIKA,MS A M DCOSTA,B SAHA,MR. C CHAKRAVARTY,MR D DAS,MR A I TALUKDAR,MR. S K DAS,MR H K DAS,MR N K SARMA,MS D MAHANTA
-
2.THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION (SECONDARY) DEPARTMENT
-
3.THE INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS, KDC, KAMRUP
-
4.THE HEAD MASTER CUM SECRETARY OF BADLA RANGAPANI HIGH SCHOOL
-
5.MD. AZAHAR ALI AHMED
-
6.ABDUR RASHID AHMED
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Robin PhukanView PDF
Case Summary: WP(C) 4387/2023 The Gauhati High Court dismissed a petition by Assistant Teacher Rahom Ali Ahmed challenging an Educational Tribunal's decision declaring respondent Md. Azahar Ali Ahmed as the senior-most Science Teacher and entitled to provincialization at Badla Rangapani High School. The court upheld the tribunal's application of the 2011 Act (rather than 2017 Act) based on vested rights doctrine, rejecting the petitioner's arguments regarding government sanction requirements and subject-combination criteria, and confirming that seniority in the category—not subject combination—determines provincialization eligibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Feb-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Robin PhukanView PDF
-
06-Jan-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Robin PhukanView PDF
-
16-Dec-2025
Orders
Honourable Mr. Justice Robin Phukan
-
01-Dec-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Robin PhukanView PDF
-
12-Nov-2025
Orders
Honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik Goswami
-
13-Oct-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Nelson SailoView PDF
-
08-Sep-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik GoswamiView PDF
-
08-Sep-2025
Orders
Honourable Mrs. Justice Marli Vankung
-
20-Aug-2025
Honourable Mrs. Justice Marli VankungView PDF
-
30-Apr-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Lanusungkum JamirView PDF
-
19-Mar-2025
Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF
-
13-Nov-2024
Honourable Mr. Justice K. SemaView PDF
-
20-Jun-2024
Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan NairView PDF
-
10-Oct-2023
Honourable Mr. Justice Achintya Malla Bujor BaruaView PDF
-
10-Oct-2023
Orders
Honourable Mr. Justice Achintya Malla Bujor Barua
-
14-Sep-2023
Honourable Mr. Justice Achintya Malla Bujor BaruaView PDF
-
14-Sep-2023
Motion
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra Saikia
-
16-Aug-2023
Honourable Mr. Justice Soumitra SaikiaView PDF
-
16-Aug-2023
Motion
Honourable Mr. Justice Lanusungkum Jamir
-
11-Aug-2023
Honourable Mr. Justice Lanusungkum JamirView PDF
-
11-Aug-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Aug-2023
Honourable Mr. Justice Lanusungkum JamirView PDF
-
20-Jul-2023
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/4387/2023
Case Summary: WP(C) 4387/2023 The Gauhati High Court dismissed a petition by Assistant Teacher Rahom Ali Ahmed challenging an Educational Tribunal's decision declaring respondent Md. Azahar Ali Ahmed as the senior-most Science Teacher and entitled to provincialization at Badla Rangapani High School. The court upheld the tribunal's application of the 2011 Act (rather than 2017 Act) based on vested rights doctrine, rejecting the petitioner's arguments regarding government sanction requirements and subject-combination criteria, and confirming that seniority in the category—not subject combination—determines provincialization eligibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts