SARAMUL HOQUE LASKAR vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS. Advocate - GA, ASSAM — WP(C)/5019/2022
Case under Constitution of India Section ARTICLE 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 01st April 2026.
CNR: GAHC010150832022
Filing Number
WP(C)/9115/2022
Filing Date
30-Jul-2022
Registration No
WP(C)/5019/2022
Registration Date
02-Aug-2022
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan Nair
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan Nair
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10040 - Other service matters with respect to State Govt Employees. ( 40 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Of
Last updated 01-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SARAMUL HOQUE LASKAR
Adv. MR. M H LASKAR,M. HOSSAIN,M. HOSSAIN, ,MR. S ROY,M. HOSSAIN
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS. Advocate - GA (Government Advocate), ASSAM
-
2.THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ASSAM
-
3.THE STATE LEVEL POLICE RECRUITMENT BOARD, ASSAM
-
4.THE DISTRICT LEVEL POLICE RECRUITMENT BOARD, CACHAR
-
5.THE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT (CID), ASSAM
-
6.ALL INDIA IT ASSOCIATION
-
7.INTEND INNOVATION PVT. LTD.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan NairView PDF
The Gauhati High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Saramul Hoque Laskar against the State of Assam and police recruitment boards on April 1, 2026. The petitioner withdrew the petition after he was subsequently appointed to a government service, and the court allowed the withdrawal without objection from the state. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Nov-2025
Joint Registrar (Judl.) Mr. Chinmoy BaruahView PDF
-
05-Aug-2022
Honourable Mr. Justice Michael ZothankhumaView PDF
-
30-Jul-2022
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/5019/2022
The Gauhati High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Saramul Hoque Laskar against the State of Assam and police recruitment boards on April 1, 2026. The petitioner withdrew the petition after he was subsequently appointed to a government service, and the court allowed the withdrawal without objection from the state. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts