SANGITA SAHARIA AND ORS vs SABITA NATH AND ORS Advocate - SC, SEC. EDU., ,MR A R BHUYAN — I.A.(Civil)/2122/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --Disposed Of on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC010141812025

e-Filing Number

24-06-2025

Filing Number

I.A.(Civil)/8159/2025

Filing Date

24-Jun-2025

Registration No

I.A.(Civil)/2122/2025

Registration Date

26-Jun-2025

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Medhi , Honourable Mrs. Justice Shamima Jahan

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Medhi , Honourable Mrs. Justice Shamima Jahan

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed Of

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANGITA SAHARIA AND ORS

    Adv. MR T GOGOI,MR D MAHANTA,MR D MAHANTA, ,MR D MAHANTA

  2. 2.JAHERUL ISLAM

  3. 3.REKIBUR RAHMAN

  4. 4.GULSHAN BEGAM

  5. 5.SHIPAK SAHA

  6. 6.HIMASHREE DAS

  7. 7.MD HAFIZUR RAHMAN

  8. 8.MAHMUDA KHANAM LASKAR

  9. 9.MOIDUL ISLAM

  10. 10.DHARITRI NATH

  11. 11.MANISHA SARMA

  12. 12.SAGARIKA SARMA

  13. 13.ISWARI DEVI

  14. 14.PUTALI SAIKIA

  15. 15.RIMA GOSWAMI

  16. 16.SAYED SALIM AHMED

  17. 17.PRANKRISHNA DAS

  18. 18.SUDIPA NATH

  19. 19.JAHANGIR ALOM

  20. 20.DIPIKA CHANDA

  21. 21.DARSHANA MEDHI

  22. 22.AFSANA AHMED

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SABITA NATH AND ORS Advocate - SC, SEC. EDU., ,MR A R BHUYAN

  2. 2.UTTAM SINGH

  3. 3.HUSSAIN MOHAMMAD SELIM AKHTAR

  4. 4.KALPANA RAJBONGSHI

  5. 5.CHANDAN SARKAR

  6. 6.KABIR HUSSAIN

  7. 7.TAHMINA AHMED

  8. 8.AFJALUR HOQUE DEWAN

  9. 9.SANATANA BRAHMA

  10. 10.PANKAJ ROY

  11. 11.PARAN ALI KHAN

  12. 12.RAJESH BISWAS

  13. 13.BIPUL DAS

  14. 14.DIPTI BISWAS

  15. 15.SADDAM HUSSAIN

  16. 16.REKHA DEVI

  17. 17.SHAH ALOM CHAUDHURY

  18. 18.JURI LAHAKAR

  19. 19.PAKHI HAZARIKA

  20. 20.RANJU BORDOLOI

  21. 21.BANASHREE BARMAN

  22. 22.RIVULET BORAH

  23. 23.KARABI MILI

  24. 24.THE STATE OF ASSAM

  25. 25.THE DIRECTOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Medhi,honourable Mrs. Justice Shamima JahanView PDF

    Summary of I.A.(Civil)/2122/2025 The Gauhati High Court allowed an interlocutory application by 22 applicants (Sangita Saharia and others) seeking impleadment as respondents in connected writ petition WP(C)/1392/2025. The applicants, all candidates who participated in a secondary education selection process, successfully argued their rights would be directly affected by the petition's outcome. The court accepted their bona fide claim and directed their addition as respondents 58-79, requiring amended cause title filing within 10 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    - For Orders -

    Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr. Justice Arun Dev Choudhury

  4. 09-Feb-2026

    - For Orders -

    Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr. Justice Arun Dev Choudhury

  5. 11-Dec-2025

    - For Orders -

    Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr. Justice Arun Dev Choudhury

  6. 13-Nov-2025

    - For Orders -

    Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr. Justice Arun Dev Choudhury

  7. 24-Sep-2025

    Honourable The Chief Justice,honourable Mr. Justice Arun Dev ChoudhuryView PDF

  8. 23-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 24-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. I.A.(Civil)/2122/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of I.A.(Civil)/2122/2025 The Gauhati High Court allowed an interlocutory application by 22 applicants (Sangita Saharia and others) seeking impleadment as respondents in connected writ petition WP(C)/1392/2025. The applicants, all candidates who participated in a secondary education selection process, successfully argued their rights would be directly affected by the petition's outcome. The court accepted their bona fide claim and directed their addition as respondents 58-79, requiring amended cause title filing within 10 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case