RENUBALA GHOSH AND ANR vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR Advocate - PP, ASSAM, ,N HASAN,F. SHAHIN,P SINGH,MR A HUSSAIN,MR. B K SEN,MR. T U LASKAR,MS. U BARUAH — Crl.Pet./614/2023
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 23rd April 2026.
CNR: GAHC010136492023
Filing Number
Crl.Pet./6318/2023
Filing Date
19-06-2023
Registration No
Crl.Pet./614/2023
Registration Date
21-06-2023
Judge
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA
Coram
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10263 - Criminal Revisions for quashing of criminal proceeding ( 221 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
23rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RENUBALA GHOSH AND ANR
Adv. MS. R CHOUDHURY,MRS. S ROY,MRS. S ROY, ,MRS. S ROY
SMT. LILA SAHA
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor), ASSAM, ,N HASAN,F. SHAHIN,P SINGH,MR A HUSSAIN,MR. B K SEN,MR. T U LASKAR,MS. U BARUAH
SRI MORON KUMAR GHOSH
Hearing History
Judge: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA
ADMISSION
ADMISSION
ADMISSION
ADMISSION
ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | ADMISSION |
| 24-02-2026 | ADMISSION |
| 13-02-2026 | ADMISSION |
| 11-02-2026 | ADMISSION |
| 02-02-2026 | ADMISSION |
Orders
Case Summary: Crl.Pet./614/2023 Court Decision: The Gauhati High Court dismissed the petitioners' plea to quash criminal proceedings under Sections 447/427/294/34 IPC. Despite acknowledging the underlying dispute arose from a pending civil land ownership case, the court found criminal allegations of trespass, property damage, and verbal abuse sufficiently disclosed criminal offences and declined to invoke Section 482 CrPC to quash the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Crl.Pet./614/2023 Court Decision: The Gauhati High Court dismissed the petitioners' plea to quash criminal proceedings under Sections 447/427/294/34 IPC. Despite acknowledging the underlying dispute arose from a pending civil land ownership case, the court found criminal allegations of trespass, property damage, and verbal abuse sufficiently disclosed criminal offences and declined to invoke Section 482 CrPC to quash the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts